Boston, San Francisco, and Washington D.C. I am a terrorist
sympathiser.

RB

Finally, Bobsprit posts the truth.

Note the difference in our posts. Neal has to invent stuff while I only need
point out that he supports a proven murder who lets Saddam and Bin Laden roam
free.
FACTS.

RB

Just the opposite. It is YOU who make things up.
It is I who show the absurdity of your seditious
claims and slander. You make a fool out of
yourself. I just point out how big a fool. . .

S.Simon



"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
Boston, San Francisco, and Washington D.C. I am a terrorist
sympathiser.

RB

Finally, Bobsprit posts the truth.

Just the opposite. It is YOU who make things up.

FACTS:

Bush was IN CHARGE when 9/11 occured.
Bush continues to be lax in security measures.
Bush failed COMPLETELY to catch the people behind 9/11.
Bush started a war using such small force that he's only fueling the problem.
Bush failed COMPLETELY to catch Saddam before he could do more damage.
Bush is getting Americans and others killed by his actions.
Bush is incapable of speaking in an educated manner.
On the average every 10th word from Bush is "Uhhhhh."
Bush is against women's rights.
Bush is damaging the proper seperation of church and state.
Another terror attack on our soil will be due to WEAK action by a man who isn't
qualified to run a bath, let alone a country.

FACTS. I don't have to call you a Saddam supporter. I know you're not. Nor am
I. But Bush actions are weak and invalid. Our forces currently employed will
NOT get the job done. More Americans will die.
A stronger person is needed at the helm. at the moment we are on Dick Cheney
autopilot and everyone seems to know this but you. It has NOTHING to do with
party or being liberal, you ass. Anyone can see we're not going to dent a
fanatical group with such a small effort, so why sacrifice lives? Bush couldn't
do it right, so he did it anyway.
And now thousands will die. He's among the worst leaders of all time. Even
Nixon would handle this better!

Capt RB

"Bobsprit" FACTS:

Bush was IN CHARGE when 9/11 occured.

So what? It was all planned while your man was in charge.
Your man cut the military, your man cut the CIA and FBI
manpower and budgets. Think of it this way. You're married
to Suzanne and six months after the ceremony she pops out a
baby that is genetically proven to belong to Mike Tyson.
You where in charge when your wife had the baby so does
that mean the baby is yours?

Bush continues to be lax in security measures.

Ever heard of the Dept. of Homeland Security about which
you liberals claim is taking away all your rights and freedoms.
Hey, you can't have it both ways.

Bush failed COMPLETELY to catch the people behind 9/11.

Totally incorrect. Many of those responsible are dead or under
arrest. There is no proof bin Laden is alive.

Bush started a war using such small force that he's only fueling the problem.

The 'small' force won the war in record time and with record
small casualties. This same force is now in the process of mopping
up Al queda rabble along with other terrorists murderers.

Bush failed COMPLETELY to catch Saddam before he could do more damage.

There is no proof Saddam is still alive and if he is alive he is out
of the picture.

Bush is getting Americans and others killed by his actions.

Excuse me. Have you forgotten the war in Iraq was approved by
Congress?

Bush is incapable of speaking in an educated manner.

Maybe you are incapable of understanding normal speech?
It seems odd that plenty enough people understood the
Presidents message - enough to elect hiim president.

On the average every 10th word from Bush is "Uhhhhh."

Far better than every third word from you being 'Duh'.

Bush is against women's rights.

Women have no rights.

Bush is damaging the proper seperation of church and state.

There is no seperation of church and state. Read the Constitution.
Seperation of church and state is strictly a liberal invention.

Another terror attack on our soil will be due to WEAK action by a man who isn't
qualified to run a bath, let alone a country.

No, it will be due to a terrorist attack.


All your ideas are based on warped thinking caused
by hatred of a man who beats you at every turn.
Mr. Bush stands in contrast to the bankrupt liberal
ideas you espouse. Mr. Bush reveals the folly of
your hatred, negativism, lies, slander, sedition
and other dangerous, dead-end policies. You offer
nothing but a wrecking ball while Mr. Bush is
running a building and maintenance company.

S.Simon

that is genetically proven to belong to Mike Tyson.
You where in charge when your wife had the baby so does
that mean the baby is yours?

I call the doctor, he checks to see that the baby is shaped like a pit bull and
I do a late term abortion.
It's call PREVENTION. 9/11 was probably in the works for MANY years. No one can
stop people from planning attacks. But it was Bush' job to PREVENT the attack.
Zzzzzzzzzz at the wheel.

RB

Here's my theory, for what it's worth.

I believe that the terrorist threat in the US is virtually zero. It would
be a no-brainer to create terror in the US without even dying. For
example, propane tanks are readily available for a very low cost.
There are no incidents at all, no explosions on the freeways, in
tunnels, on bridges. The method of the terrorist is first to instill
terror, the second is to die doing it. Look at what happened with
the two snipers... they did little actual damage and killed just a
few people, but people were afraid to go out of their houses.

Now, it would be easy to say that the Feds are preventing these
things from happening, but it's hard to believe that they're capable
of stopping a few individuals from doing relatively tiny things, such
as buying a couple of propane tanks and making a home-made
fuse.

I believe there is a vast right wing conspiracy (ahahhaahahah) to
destroy our civil rights.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Just the opposite. It is YOU who make things up.

FACTS:

Bush was IN CHARGE when 9/11 occured.
Bush continues to be lax in security measures.
Bush failed COMPLETELY to catch the people behind 9/11.
Bush started a war using such small force that he's only fueling the
problem.
Bush failed COMPLETELY to catch Saddam before he could do more damage.
Bush is getting Americans and others killed by his actions.
Bush is incapable of speaking in an educated manner.
On the average every 10th word from Bush is "Uhhhhh."
Bush is against women's rights.
Bush is damaging the proper seperation of church and state.
Another terror attack on our soil will be due to WEAK action by a man who
isn't
qualified to run a bath, let alone a country.

FACTS. I don't have to call you a Saddam supporter. I know you're not. Nor
am
I. But Bush actions are weak and invalid. Our forces currently employed
will
NOT get the job done. More Americans will die.
A stronger person is needed at the helm. at the moment we are on Dick
Cheney
autopilot and everyone seems to know this but you. It has NOTHING to do
with
party or being liberal, you ass. Anyone can see we're not going to dent a
fanatical group with such a small effort, so why sacrifice lives? Bush
couldn't
do it right, so he did it anyway.
And now thousands will die. He's among the worst leaders of all time. Even
Nixon would handle this better!

Capt RB

I believe there is a vast right wing conspiracy (ahahhaahahah) to
destroy our civil rights.

IN some respects I agree with you. But bush will fail at this as others before
him. I'll give him and his party credit. They are among the most damaging and
evil groups ever to be in office in this country.

RB

Get used to it. Bush is a two-term president. The majority
of people realize he's doing a great job and with the
economy doing well they will vote their pocketbook as
is the usual case. By the time of the elections the situation
in Iraq will be relatively stable and troops will be coming
home. You liberal losers have NOTHING in the way of
issues to hang your reelection bid on. You have no decent
candidates and no chance. You are on the wrong side of
every important issue. If there is another terrorist attack
here at home people will rally around the president against
terrorists again. If there is no terrorist attack people will
give the Presidents policies credit for preventing terrorists
attacks. You guys lose both ways. Best you wait and vote for
Hillary in 2008 (who will also lose).

Bwahhahahahahahahhahahah!

S.Simon


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...

IN some respects I agree with you. .

Who is she going to lose to? Chumpy will be long dead from
another heart attack. Are you thinking of Jeb?

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Get used to it. Bush is a two-term president. The majority
of people realize he's doing a great job and with the
economy doing well they will vote their pocketbook as
is the usual case. By the time of the elections the situation
in Iraq will be relatively stable and troops will be coming
home. You liberal losers have NOTHING in the way of
issues to hang your reelection bid on. You have no decent
candidates and no chance. You are on the wrong side of
every important issue. If there is another terrorist attack
here at home people will rally around the president against
terrorists again. If there is no terrorist attack people will
give the Presidents policies credit for preventing terrorists
attacks. You guys lose both ways. Best you wait and vote for
Hillary in 2008 (who will also lose).

Bwahhahahahahahahhahahah!

S.Simon


"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...

IN some respects I agree with you. .

Best you wait and vote for
Hillary in 2008 (who will also lose).

Hillary who? The knighted explorer?