I'm not referring to documentation you imbicile! ADDRESS -- ADDRESS --
ADDRESS -- ADDRESS !!!!!!

Negative!

Draft and depth are two different things. Documenting
is all about tonnage and tonnage is a measurement of
freight carrying capacity in cubic feet. The depth is
one of the measurements of the volume of a vessel
and its ability to haul cargo. Documentation was
never really meant to be used for pleasure yachts.

S.Simon

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news
Did they list a draft measurement? If not than you can assume that depth of
hull is the draft of the vessel from waterline.... which would be correct
for Alien.

CM

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
|
|
| What an IDIOT!
|
| The construction of the hull has NOTHING to do
| with the depth measurement.
|
| The depth measurement is from the overhead to
| the top of the hull and is measured in the accommodation
| from the overhead to the floor of the hull atop the keel.
|
| The entire keel is NOT measured. What a PUTZ!
|
| S.Simon
|
|
| wrote in message
...
| On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:41:12 -0500, "Jeff Morris"
| wrote:
|
| We take it for granted that Booby knows nothing of these things. But
it would appear
| that neither do you.
|
| For starters, the number implies that the vessel was documented roughly
20 years ago.
| Its rather unlikely that RB (or any other owner) would bother changing
the measurement, so
| this is probably the original measurement that the factory supplied.
|
| Also, "Hull Depth" usually refers to the distance from the top of the
deck or sometimes
| the coachroof, down to the bottom of the hull, not including the keel.
|
| Due to the particular construction of C&C's, with a faired in keel stub,
the
| entire keel legally qualifies as part of the hull for measurement
purposes.
|
| BB
|
|

Well, then THEY are idiots and engaging in an illegal
act. False statements on documentation paperwork
would not be tolerated by those interested in the
legitimacy of the document.

S.Simon


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
You're an idiot. When a change of ownership occurs
the papers can and should be revised or amended
to correct errors like a five foot depth. Booby's
boat has at least a six-foot depth as depth is measured
from the overhead to the top of the keel.

Nope, Jeff is right. We spoke to the CG and they reccomended that we keep the
measurement which is as jeff described.

RB

Well, then THEY are idiots and engaging in an illegal
act. False statements on documentation paperwork
would not be tolerated by those interested in the
legitimacy of the document.

You are simply still not aware that the figure is correct for a C&C 32. It's
pretty sad how stupid you are!

RB

Draft of a vessel is a viable measurement. Gross tonnage would be as well.
Volume depends on the design of the vessel since you cannot derive volume
unless you have depth, length and width at stations throughout the length.
Since this differs greatly between different designs the carrying volume
would be a separate measurement not derived from one maximum "depth",
maximum width or maximum length.

Your supposition lacks merit upon close examination. I'd bet vessel depth
reflects the draft. It certainly has nothing whatsoever to do with the
volume of a hold or carrying capacity.

CM






"Simple Simon" wrote in message
news | Negative!
|
| Draft and depth are two different things. Documenting
| is all about tonnage and tonnage is a measurement of
| freight carrying capacity in cubic feet. The depth is
| one of the measurements of the volume of a vessel
| and its ability to haul cargo. Documentation was
| never really meant to be used for pleasure yachts.
|
| S.Simon
|
| "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news | Did they list a draft measurement? If not than you can assume that depth
of
| hull is the draft of the vessel from waterline.... which would be
correct
| for Alien.
|
| CM
|
| "Simple Simon" wrote in message
| ...
| |
| |
| | What an IDIOT!
| |
| | The construction of the hull has NOTHING to do
| | with the depth measurement.
| |
| | The depth measurement is from the overhead to
| | the top of the hull and is measured in the accommodation
| | from the overhead to the floor of the hull atop the keel.
| |
| | The entire keel is NOT measured. What a PUTZ!
| |
| | S.Simon
| |
| |
| | wrote in message
| ...
| | On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:41:12 -0500, "Jeff Morris"
| | wrote:
| |
| | We take it for granted that Booby knows nothing of these things.
But
| it would appear
| | that neither do you.
| |
| | For starters, the number implies that the vessel was documented
roughly
| 20 years ago.
| | Its rather unlikely that RB (or any other owner) would bother
changing
| the measurement, so
| | this is probably the original measurement that the factory
supplied.
| |
| | Also, "Hull Depth" usually refers to the distance from the top of
the
| deck or sometimes
| | the coachroof, down to the bottom of the hull, not including the
keel.
| |
| | Due to the particular construction of C&C's, with a faired in keel
stub,
| the
| | entire keel legally qualifies as part of the hull for measurement
| purposes.
| |
| | BB
| |
| |
|
|
|
|

You're trying to tell me that you have less than
five feet of head room in the accommodation?

Bwahahahhahahahahhahahah!


S.Simon



"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
Well, then THEY are idiots and engaging in an illegal
act. False statements on documentation paperwork
would not be tolerated by those interested in the
legitimacy of the document.

You are simply still not aware that the figure is correct for a C&C 32. It's
pretty sad how stupid you are!

RB

You're wrong. Depth by definition is maximum depth.

In the same way LWL is the maximum length at the
water line.

In the same LOA is the maximum length from stem
to stern.

Look it up.

S.Simon


"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ...
Draft of a vessel is a viable measurement. Gross tonnage would be as well.
Volume depends on the design of the vessel since you cannot derive volume
unless you have depth, length and width at stations throughout the length.
Since this differs greatly between different designs the carrying volume
would be a separate measurement not derived from one maximum "depth",
maximum width or maximum length.

Your supposition lacks merit upon close examination. I'd bet vessel depth
reflects the draft. It certainly has nothing whatsoever to do with the
volume of a hold or carrying capacity.

CM






"Simple Simon" wrote in message
news | Negative!
|
| Draft and depth are two different things. Documenting
| is all about tonnage and tonnage is a measurement of
| freight carrying capacity in cubic feet. The depth is
| one of the measurements of the volume of a vessel
| and its ability to haul cargo. Documentation was
| never really meant to be used for pleasure yachts.
|
| S.Simon
|
| "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news | Did they list a draft measurement? If not than you can assume that depth
of
| hull is the draft of the vessel from waterline.... which would be
correct
| for Alien.
|
| CM
|
| "Simple Simon" wrote in message
| ...
| |
| |
| | What an IDIOT!
| |
| | The construction of the hull has NOTHING to do
| | with the depth measurement.
| |
| | The depth measurement is from the overhead to
| | the top of the hull and is measured in the accommodation
| | from the overhead to the floor of the hull atop the keel.
| |
| | The entire keel is NOT measured. What a PUTZ!
| |
| | S.Simon
| |
| |
| | wrote in message
| ...
| | On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:41:12 -0500, "Jeff Morris"
| | wrote:
| |
| | We take it for granted that Booby knows nothing of these things.
But
| it would appear
| | that neither do you.
| |
| | For starters, the number implies that the vessel was documented
roughly
| 20 years ago.
| | Its rather unlikely that RB (or any other owner) would bother
changing
| the measurement, so
| | this is probably the original measurement that the factory
supplied.
| |
| | Also, "Hull Depth" usually refers to the distance from the top of
the
| deck or sometimes
| | the coachroof, down to the bottom of the hull, not including the
keel.
| |
| | Due to the particular construction of C&C's, with a faired in keel
stub,
| the
| | entire keel legally qualifies as part of the hull for measurement
| purposes.
| |
| | BB
| |
| |
|
|
|
|

Bobby's full name and address have appeared here many times.

Sorry, Bill. You've been busted again. I've never listed my complete address
here. You are the only lowlife to do that. Like I said before, you, Neal and
Scotty are the lowest lifeforms in this NG. Interesting that all 3 are stuck in
little cheap boats.

RB

Capt. kangaroo wrote ....

Yeah, but I've got your phone number tucked away in
my little black book.


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

PHONEBOOK--PHONEBOOK--PHONEBOOK--PHONEBOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


"JN" wrote ...
I'm not referring to documentation you imbicile! ADDRESS -- ADDRESS --
ADDRESS -- ADDRESS !!!!!!