Republican logic applied!
 

"We're in Iraq to save the populace from a murderous regime!"

"We're in Iraq because they threaten our national security!"

So bleat the Republican sheep! Well, lets apply those premises rigorously to
an even better example - Africa!

1. Hussien has killed a few million, many brutally. Even worse goes on in
Africa: cannabilism, murders of tens of millions, disease, funding of
terrorism (diamonds) and a shelter for terrorists.

2. Hussien was a remote threat at best. The threats came mostly from
Arab-American citizens and Arabs in the US. Perhaps a few hundred of these
folk. Meanwhile, there's millions of African-Americans in our prisons for
numerous crimes. The average America is statistically threatened more by an
African American than by an Arab. So if the Republican reasons for invading
Iraq are valid, then isn't the case more compelling to attack and liberate
Africa?

Think about it. Question authority.

RB

Republican logic applied!
 

On July 8, 1947, witnesses claim a spaceship with five aliens aboard crashed
on a sheep-and-cattle ranch outside Roswell New Mexico, an incident they say
has been covered up by the military.

On March 31, 1948, exactly nine months after that day, Al Gore was born.

A coincidence? Maybe, but he sure enough fits the bill!

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
k.net...
"We're in Iraq to save the populace from a murderous regime!"

"We're in Iraq because they threaten our national security!"

So bleat the Republican sheep! Well, lets apply those premises rigorously
to
an even better example - Africa!

1. Hussien has killed a few million, many brutally. Even worse goes on in
Africa: cannabilism, murders of tens of millions, disease, funding of
terrorism (diamonds) and a shelter for terrorists.

2. Hussien was a remote threat at best. The threats came mostly from
Arab-American citizens and Arabs in the US. Perhaps a few hundred of these
folk. Meanwhile, there's millions of African-Americans in our prisons for
numerous crimes. The average America is statistically threatened more by
an
African American than by an Arab. So if the Republican reasons for
invading
Iraq are valid, then isn't the case more compelling to attack and liberate
Africa?

Think about it. Question authority.

RB

Republican logic applied!
 

You ignorant dupe. We're in Iraq to gain control of Middle East oil. You,
Oz, MC, and other true believing liberals, and Horvath, Simon and the other
true believing conservatives, are the only ones who believe the government
and the press. What naive and trusting jerks you all are.



"Bobsprit" wrote in message
k.net...
"We're in Iraq to save the populace from a murderous regime!"

"We're in Iraq because they threaten our national security!"

So bleat the Republican sheep! Well, lets apply those premises rigorously
to
an even better example - Africa!

1. Hussien has killed a few million, many brutally. Even worse goes on in
Africa: cannabilism, murders of tens of millions, disease, funding of
terrorism (diamonds) and a shelter for terrorists.

2. Hussien was a remote threat at best. The threats came mostly from
Arab-American citizens and Arabs in the US. Perhaps a few hundred of these
folk. Meanwhile, there's millions of African-Americans in our prisons for
numerous crimes. The average America is statistically threatened more by
an
African American than by an Arab. So if the Republican reasons for
invading
Iraq are valid, then isn't the case more compelling to attack and liberate
Africa?

Think about it. Question authority.

RB

Republican logic applied!
 

What naive and trusting jerks you all are.

Yup.

RB




"HUh?" wrote in message
igy.com...
You ignorant dupe. We're in Iraq to gain control of Middle East oil.
You,
Oz, MC, and other true believing liberals, and Horvath, Simon and the
other
true believing conservatives, are the only ones who believe the government
and the press. What naive and trusting jerks you all are.



"Bobsprit" wrote in message
k.net...
"We're in Iraq to save the populace from a murderous regime!"

"We're in Iraq because they threaten our national security!"

So bleat the Republican sheep! Well, lets apply those premises
rigorously
to
an even better example - Africa!

1. Hussien has killed a few million, many brutally. Even worse goes on
in
Africa: cannabilism, murders of tens of millions, disease, funding of
terrorism (diamonds) and a shelter for terrorists.

2. Hussien was a remote threat at best. The threats came mostly from
Arab-American citizens and Arabs in the US. Perhaps a few hundred of
these
folk. Meanwhile, there's millions of African-Americans in our prisons
for
numerous crimes. The average America is statistically threatened more by
an
African American than by an Arab. So if the Republican reasons for
invading
Iraq are valid, then isn't the case more compelling to attack and
liberate
Africa?

Think about it. Question authority.

RB

Republican logic applied!
 

What's a jerk? Is it like a jolt?

Cheers MC

Bobsprit wrote:

What naive and trusting jerks you all are.


Yup.

RB




"HUh?" wrote in message
igy.com...

You ignorant dupe. We're in Iraq to gain control of Middle East oil.

You,

Oz, MC, and other true believing liberals, and Horvath, Simon and the

other

true believing conservatives, are the only ones who believe the government
and the press. What naive and trusting jerks you all are.



"Bobsprit" wrote in message
ink.net...

"We're in Iraq to save the populace from a murderous regime!"

"We're in Iraq because they threaten our national security!"

So bleat the Republican sheep! Well, lets apply those premises

rigorously

to

an even better example - Africa!

1. Hussien has killed a few million, many brutally. Even worse goes on

in

Africa: cannabilism, murders of tens of millions, disease, funding of
terrorism (diamonds) and a shelter for terrorists.

2. Hussien was a remote threat at best. The threats came mostly from
Arab-American citizens and Arabs in the US. Perhaps a few hundred of

these

folk. Meanwhile, there's millions of African-Americans in our prisons

for

numerous crimes. The average America is statistically threatened more by

an

African American than by an Arab. So if the Republican reasons for

invading

Iraq are valid, then isn't the case more compelling to attack and

liberate

Africa?

Think about it. Question authority.

RB