| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Charles T. Low"
snip I'm left not knowing for sure if your four conclusions are opinions, "guessed" from the Rules, or whether the Rules actually say what you're saying. So, I would appreciate it if you would flesh it out a bit more. snip "Simple Simon" snip I say there is a pecking order in restricted visibility. Lsnip My argument has been and is that stand-on and give-way vessels exist in or near restricted visibility and I have proven it below in a step-by-step, logical fashion. snip from the COLREGS http://www.oz.net/~papillon/kbmanual/colregs.html "Rule 4 Application "Rules in this section apply to any condition of visibility." That seems to say it all. Thanks SS Everett |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| COLREGS - The final word on pecking order in restricted visibility. | General | |||
| Perception | ASA | |||
| Ellen MacArthur, Tthe Reluctant Heroine | ASA | |||
| A tough question for Jeff and Shen44 | ASA | |||