Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd say that supports exactly what I've been saying. Given the timing, it was certainly a
huge improvement, but it was one of many necessary to create a workable system. Your link makes it sound like they invented the cavity magnetron, which is certainly not true. And don't forget, at this point in time, the US wasn't even in the war. We were spending billions of dollars developing Radar to save Britain. "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... http://www.marconicalling.com/museum...-i=64-s=6.html "In Britain the Royal Navy had for some time been aware of the importance of ultra-short wave radio for inter-ship communication and early in the Second World War had contracted with Birmingham University to conduct research into transmitting and receiving valves functioning at 10 centimetres. Research conducted by two young scientists assigned to the project, John Randall and Harry Boot, resulted in the creation of the cavity magnetron, which was small enough to be held in one hand, yet could produce 400 watts of power at the required 10 centimetre wavelength, over 100 times more than the most powerful valve then in existence, the klystron. In August 1940, at the height of the Battle of Britain, the cavity magnetron was taken to the USA by a small party of scientists and service officers, led by Tizard. The Americans were so impressed that production of the British cavity magnetron began within weeks." I'd say the US knows a gift when they see it? Cheers MC |