| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Perception
"Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Hey stupid. The 'bridge' does not exist in the Rules with respect to keeping a lookout at all times. Lamers using dangerous excuses and practices like maintaining that you can't see a vessel if the vessel can't see the bridge shows you are unqualified to be a captain. Absolutely correct. A friend, who is in the merchant marine has told me that someone is always sent to the bow in thick fog. I'm surprised that otn is unaware of good practise! Regards Donal -- |
Perception
ROFL ...... shhhhhhhhhh
otn Donal wrote: "otnmbrd" wrote in message . net... That's why you are and probably always will be, an amateur, Donal. Anyone with any experience and common sense would have learned to expect the unexpected and always keep the possibilities in mind, no matter how slight the chances. It is very refreshing to see that you acknowledge that a motor vessel reducing it's speed to bare steerageway would be "unexpected". Regards Donal -- otn Donal wrote: "Shen44" wrote in message ... OOPS ....Forgot one: What if the sailboat comes out of the fog (and can see the motor vessel) and finds itself overtaking the motor vessel, because the motor vessel has reduced speed to bare steerageway? I'd be much more concerned about the risk of collision with a low flying pig! Regards Donal -- |
Perception
Hey stupid. The bridge is where the ship is maneuvered from. One does
not make maneuvers based on scanty information. One make maneuvers, after the lookout reports the sighting, and some idea as to the movement of the other vessel can be determined. Sheesh, you are such an inexperienced piece of junk......knowing you are there, and knowing what you are doing and how to react to it, are two different things. You haven't got the common sense or intelligence of one of my Mastiff's, and they are well known for a low brain cell count. otn Simple Simon wrote: Hey stupid. The 'bridge' does not exist in the Rules with respect to keeping a lookout at all times. Lamers using dangerous excuses and practices like maintaining that you can't see a vessel if the vessel can't see the bridge shows you are unqualified to be a captain. Read the Rules pertaining to keeping a lookout. It says nothing about keeping a lookout on the bridge only. You are required to be aware of other vessels around you even if it requires posting a man or men at the bow, at the stern and any place else not visible from the bridge. You really embarrassed yourself this time. What an ignoramous! S.Simon "otnmbrd" wrote in message t... It doesn't. Assume that they can't until it would be obvious to even a "Simple Simon" that they couldn't use "restricted visibility" as an excuse for not obeying the rules. If you can't see the bridge, the bridge cannot see you. otn Wally wrote: otnmbrd wrote: If BOTH vessels are in sight of each other then visual rules apply. If only one or neither vessel is in sight of the other, then the rules for restricted visibility apply and BOTH vessels must navigate with extreme caution until they are clear of each other. How does the vessel that can see the other know that the other can see it? -- Wally www.makearatherlonglinkthattakesyounowhere.com Things are always clearer in the cold, post-upload light. |
Perception
Very much aware, but also aware that the information supplied, is only
the beginning of the process to react. otn Donal wrote: "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Hey stupid. The 'bridge' does not exist in the Rules with respect to keeping a lookout at all times. Lamers using dangerous excuses and practices like maintaining that you can't see a vessel if the vessel can't see the bridge shows you are unqualified to be a captain. Absolutely correct. A friend, who is in the merchant marine has told me that someone is always sent to the bow in thick fog. I'm surprised that otn is unaware of good practise! Regards Donal -- |
Perception
Slipperier than an eel you are. Slippery but not much
smarter than one, unfortunately. Your statement about if a vessel can't see the bridge of a ship then the ship cannot see the vessel was stupid, myopic, arrogant, ignorant, dangerous and unfortunate for you. It was a disgraceful thing for a licensed Master who claims to be in charge of large ships to maintain. It shows the arrogant attitude big ships have towards smaller vessels. It is the attitude that results in collisions and loss of life. It is the attitude the COLREGS were written to squash. Shame on you for requiring a mere 25GT Near Coastal Master to point out how much of an inept captain you really are. S.Simon - keeps a proper watch in all directions "otnmbrd" wrote in message ink.net... Hey stupid. The bridge is where the ship is maneuvered from. One does not make maneuvers based on scanty information. One make maneuvers, after the lookout reports the sighting, and some idea as to the movement of the other vessel can be determined. Sheesh, you are such an inexperienced piece of junk......knowing you are there, and knowing what you are doing and how to react to it, are two different things. You haven't got the common sense or intelligence of one of my Mastiff's, and they are well known for a low brain cell count. otn Simple Simon wrote: Hey stupid. The 'bridge' does not exist in the Rules with respect to keeping a lookout at all times. Lamers using dangerous excuses and practices like maintaining that you can't see a vessel if the vessel can't see the bridge shows you are unqualified to be a captain. Read the Rules pertaining to keeping a lookout. It says nothing about keeping a lookout on the bridge only. You are required to be aware of other vessels around you even if it requires posting a man or men at the bow, at the stern and any place else not visible from the bridge. You really embarrassed yourself this time. What an ignoramous! S.Simon "otnmbrd" wrote in message t... It doesn't. Assume that they can't until it would be obvious to even a "Simple Simon" that they couldn't use "restricted visibility" as an excuse for not obeying the rules. If you can't see the bridge, the bridge cannot see you. otn Wally wrote: otnmbrd wrote: If BOTH vessels are in sight of each other then visual rules apply. If only one or neither vessel is in sight of the other, then the rules for restricted visibility apply and BOTH vessels must navigate with extreme caution until they are clear of each other. How does the vessel that can see the other know that the other can see it? -- Wally www.makearatherlonglinkthattakesyounowhere.com Things are always clearer in the cold, post-upload light. |
Perception
1. Read rule 7 (c)
2. Your post below shows just how stupid and inexperienced you are. 3. Keep trying Neal, but know that we all consider you an incompetent, inexperienced danger to us all. otn Simple Simon wrote: Slipperier than an eel you are. Slippery but not much smarter than one, unfortunately. Your statement about if a vessel can't see the bridge of a ship then the ship cannot see the vessel was stupid, myopic, arrogant, ignorant, dangerous and unfortunate for you. It was a disgraceful thing for a licensed Master who claims to be in charge of large ships to maintain. It shows the arrogant attitude big ships have towards smaller vessels. It is the attitude that results in collisions and loss of life. It is the attitude the COLREGS were written to squash. Shame on you for requiring a mere 25GT Near Coastal Master to point out how much of an inept captain you really are. S.Simon - keeps a proper watch in all direction |
Perception
Rule 7 (c) states: c) Assumptions shall not be made on the basis of scanty information, especially scanty radar information. What's this got to do with keeping a proper lookout by eyes and ears? What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? You still disgraced yourself with your arrogant statement saying if a vessel cannot see the bridge then it cannot be seen. This statement is dangerously ignorant and shows a total disregard for keeping a proper lookout. S.Simon - exposing yet another pretend captain "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... 1. Read rule 7 (c) 2. Your post below shows just how stupid and inexperienced you are. 3. Keep trying Neal, but know that we all consider you an incompetent, inexperienced danger to us all. otn Simple Simon wrote: Slipperier than an eel you are. Slippery but not much smarter than one, unfortunately. Your statement about if a vessel can't see the bridge of a ship then the ship cannot see the vessel was stupid, myopic, arrogant, ignorant, dangerous and unfortunate for you. It was a disgraceful thing for a licensed Master who claims to be in charge of large ships to maintain. It shows the arrogant attitude big ships have towards smaller vessels. It is the attitude that results in collisions and loss of life. It is the attitude the COLREGS were written to squash. Shame on you for requiring a mere 25GT Near Coastal Master to point out how much of an inept captain you really are. S.Simon - keeps a proper watch in all direction |
Perception
comments interspersed:
Simple Simon wrote: Rule 7 (c) states: c) Assumptions shall not be made on the basis of scanty information, especially scanty radar information. What's this got to do with keeping a proper lookout by eyes and ears? What it has to do with it, is what you do with the information a lookout gives you, and what YOU do about course changes in a fog, based on scanty sound information. What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) You still disgraced yourself with your arrogant statement saying if a vessel cannot see the bridge then it cannot be seen. This statement is dangerously ignorant and shows a total disregard for keeping a proper lookout. The above statement is typically stupid. I could easily have said "if you cannot see the bow or bow lookout", but anyone with any intelligence would have understood that .... this excludes you, of course. It also shows you're typical lack of experience in not understanding the "mechanics" of fog and how someone higher up would not necessarily be able to see something lower down.... and vice versa. otn |
Perception
"otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon |
Perception
"otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... You still disgraced yourself with your arrogant statement saying if a vessel cannot see the bridge then it cannot be seen. This statement is dangerously ignorant and shows a total disregard for keeping a proper lookout. The above statement is typically stupid. I could easily have said "if you cannot see the bow or bow lookout", but anyone with any intelligence would have understood that .... this excludes you, of course. It also shows you're typical lack of experience in not understanding the "mechanics" of fog and how someone higher up would not necessarily be able to see something lower down.... and vice versa. But you didn't say that! What you said indicated you think it's the other vessel's responsibility to make itself visible to the bridge or assume she's not being seen. I say, in most cases, even making yourself visible to the bridge of a big ship does no increase your chances of being seen mostly because nobody in the briged pays much attention. Why bother? A little sailboat won't even make a small dent in a ship as it's being run down. That's the attitude you comment convey so loudly and clearly! That's what I object to hearing a so-called professional saying. S.Simon |
Perception
Lipitor is for cholesterol, fyi. It's not about habits, since the vast
majority of those with high cholresterol can't significantly lower it with diet. Prilosec is for acid reflux, which also isn't affected by diet. Stick to what you know... assuming you can find it. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon |
Perception
Hey silly, high cholesterol is caused by eating too much
fat and being too fat. Eating the right food, as I suggested, is proven to lower cholesterol. Getting plenty or exercise also lowers cholesterol. The same goes for acid reflux (a fancy name for heartburn). Eating less food and eating the right food will eliminate acid reflux. But, noooooooooo! People like you and Otn would rather pop expensive pills than eliminate their bad habits that are causing the problem in the first place. Go figure! S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Lipitor is for cholesterol, fyi. It's not about habits, since the vast majority of those with high cholresterol can't significantly lower it with diet. Prilosec is for acid reflux, which also isn't affected by diet. Stick to what you know... assuming you can find it. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon |
Perception
ROFL .... Nother subject you know little about.
otn Simple Simon wrote: "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon |
Perception
Comments interspersed:
Simple Simon wrote: "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... You still disgraced yourself with your arrogant statement saying if a vessel cannot see the bridge then it cannot be seen. This statement is dangerously ignorant and shows a total disregard for keeping a proper lookout. The above statement is typically stupid. I could easily have said "if you cannot see the bow or bow lookout", but anyone with any intelligence would have understood that .... this excludes you, of course. It also shows you're typical lack of experience in not understanding the "mechanics" of fog and how someone higher up would not necessarily be able to see something lower down.... and vice versa. But you didn't say that! What you said indicated you think it's the other vessel's responsibility to make itself visible to the bridge or assume she's not being seen. The above is a prime example of why we question your reasoning ability. How could you possibly come to that stupid conclusion? It's a question of ones ability to see, not responsibility to be seen. I say, in most cases, even making yourself visible to the bridge of a big ship does no increase your chances of being seen mostly because nobody in the briged pays much attention. Why bother? A little sailboat won't even make a small dent in a ship as it's being run down. Stupid waste of typing time. That's the attitude you comment convey so loudly and clearly! That's what I object to hearing a so-called professional saying. It could only have conveyed that attitude to someone of your limited abilities! otn |
Perception
No. It isn't necessarily, nor is it true in most cases. For example,
I know a guy who has extremely low cholesterol. In fact, it's so low that it's dangerous. Most people who are given lipitor can not control the high cholesterol with diet. Acid reflux has nothing to do with diet. It has to do with genetics and physiology. You know nothing about these conditions, you're demonstrating this, so why not shut up now before you become even more of a laughing stock. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Hey silly, high cholesterol is caused by eating too much fat and being too fat. Eating the right food, as I suggested, is proven to lower cholesterol. Getting plenty or exercise also lowers cholesterol. The same goes for acid reflux (a fancy name for heartburn). Eating less food and eating the right food will eliminate acid reflux. But, noooooooooo! People like you and Otn would rather pop expensive pills than eliminate their bad habits that are causing the problem in the first place. Go figure! S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Lipitor is for cholesterol, fyi. It's not about habits, since the vast majority of those with high cholresterol can't significantly lower it with diet. Prilosec is for acid reflux, which also isn't affected by diet. Stick to what you know... assuming you can find it. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon |
Perception
Here are some references, so you won't look like a total idiot
next time: Lipitor: http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/atorvastatin_ids.htm Atorvastatin is indicated as an adjunct to diet to reduce elevated total-C, LDL-C, apo B, and TG levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (heterozygous familial and nonfamilial) and mixed dyslipidemia (Fredrickson Types IIa and IIb). Atorvastatin is indcated as adjunctive therapy to diet for the treatment of patients with elevated serum triglyceride levels (Fredrickson Type IV). Atorvastatin is indicated for the treatment of patients with primary dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III) who do not respond adequately to diet. Atorvastatin is also indicated to reduce total-C and LDL-C in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia as an adjunct to other lipid-lowering treatments (e.g., LDL apheresis) or if such treatments are unavailable. Therapy with lipid-altering agents should be a component of multiple-risk-factor intervention in individuals at increased risk for atherosclerotic vascular disease due to hypercholesterolemia. Lipid-altering agents should be used in addition to a diet restricted in saturated fat and cholesterol only when the response to diet and other nonpharmacological measures has been inadequate (see National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Guidelines, summarized in TABLE 5). Acid Reflux: http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic857.htm Note that certain foods and obesity *can* decrease the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, but there is no guarantee. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon |
Perception
Ganz, YOU are uninformed and just another victim of
modern medicine and the drug industry walking hand in hand down the primrose path. Read everything on this link and do some original thinking of you own for once. Stop being duped! http://www.molocure.com/gerd.shtml?s...rd=acid_reflux S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... No. It isn't necessarily, nor is it true in most cases. For example, I know a guy who has extremely low cholesterol. In fact, it's so low that it's dangerous. Most people who are given lipitor can not control the high cholesterol with diet. Acid reflux has nothing to do with diet. It has to do with genetics and physiology. You know nothing about these conditions, you're demonstrating this, so why not shut up now before you become even more of a laughing stock. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Hey silly, high cholesterol is caused by eating too much fat and being too fat. Eating the right food, as I suggested, is proven to lower cholesterol. Getting plenty or exercise also lowers cholesterol. The same goes for acid reflux (a fancy name for heartburn). Eating less food and eating the right food will eliminate acid reflux. But, noooooooooo! People like you and Otn would rather pop expensive pills than eliminate their bad habits that are causing the problem in the first place. Go figure! S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Lipitor is for cholesterol, fyi. It's not about habits, since the vast majority of those with high cholresterol can't significantly lower it with diet. Prilosec is for acid reflux, which also isn't affected by diet. Stick to what you know... assuming you can find it. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon |
Perception
You should not believe anything the drug industry has to
say in defense of its drugs. Of course they're gonna paint a rosey picture. They are in business to sell drugs and selling drugs to lifetime patients is big business. Stop for a minute and divorce yourself from advertising hype from the drug industry. Ask yourself why acid reflux (heartburn) is such a big problem today while it was not such a big deal fifty years ago? The answer is because people aren't eating right anymore. They eat all sorts of awful crap and then they take a pill to mask the symptoms this awful diet causes. S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Here are some references, so you won't look like a total idiot next time: Lipitor: http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/atorvastatin_ids.htm Atorvastatin is indicated as an adjunct to diet to reduce elevated total-C, LDL-C, apo B, and TG levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (heterozygous familial and nonfamilial) and mixed dyslipidemia (Fredrickson Types IIa and IIb). Atorvastatin is indcated as adjunctive therapy to diet for the treatment of patients with elevated serum triglyceride levels (Fredrickson Type IV). Atorvastatin is indicated for the treatment of patients with primary dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III) who do not respond adequately to diet. Atorvastatin is also indicated to reduce total-C and LDL-C in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia as an adjunct to other lipid-lowering treatments (e.g., LDL apheresis) or if such treatments are unavailable. Therapy with lipid-altering agents should be a component of multiple-risk-factor intervention in individuals at increased risk for atherosclerotic vascular disease due to hypercholesterolemia. Lipid-altering agents should be used in addition to a diet restricted in saturated fat and cholesterol only when the response to diet and other nonpharmacological measures has been inadequate (see National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Guidelines, summarized in TABLE 5). Acid Reflux: http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic857.htm Note that certain foods and obesity *can* decrease the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, but there is no guarantee. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon |
Perception
Sure. Whatever... I certainly believe a private company over
research institues and MDs. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Ganz, YOU are uninformed and just another victim of modern medicine and the drug industry walking hand in hand down the primrose path. Read everything on this link and do some original thinking of you own for once. Stop being duped! http://www.molocure.com/gerd.shtml?s...rd=acid_reflux S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... No. It isn't necessarily, nor is it true in most cases. For example, I know a guy who has extremely low cholesterol. In fact, it's so low that it's dangerous. Most people who are given lipitor can not control the high cholesterol with diet. Acid reflux has nothing to do with diet. It has to do with genetics and physiology. You know nothing about these conditions, you're demonstrating this, so why not shut up now before you become even more of a laughing stock. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Hey silly, high cholesterol is caused by eating too much fat and being too fat. Eating the right food, as I suggested, is proven to lower cholesterol. Getting plenty or exercise also lowers cholesterol. The same goes for acid reflux (a fancy name for heartburn). Eating less food and eating the right food will eliminate acid reflux. But, noooooooooo! People like you and Otn would rather pop expensive pills than eliminate their bad habits that are causing the problem in the first place. Go figure! S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Lipitor is for cholesterol, fyi. It's not about habits, since the vast majority of those with high cholresterol can't significantly lower it with diet. Prilosec is for acid reflux, which also isn't affected by diet. Stick to what you know... assuming you can find it. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon |
Perception
Gee, now that's some interesting news. Are you actually
aware of the situation 50 years ago or is this wishful thinking. I'm betting the latter. There were no "good old days" for ailments. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... You should not believe anything the drug industry has to say in defense of its drugs. Of course they're gonna paint a rosey picture. They are in business to sell drugs and selling drugs to lifetime patients is big business. Stop for a minute and divorce yourself from advertising hype from the drug industry. Ask yourself why acid reflux (heartburn) is such a big problem today while it was not such a big deal fifty years ago? The answer is because people aren't eating right anymore. They eat all sorts of awful crap and then they take a pill to mask the symptoms this awful diet causes. S.Simon "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Here are some references, so you won't look like a total idiot next time: Lipitor: http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/atorvastatin_ids.htm Atorvastatin is indicated as an adjunct to diet to reduce elevated total-C, LDL-C, apo B, and TG levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (heterozygous familial and nonfamilial) and mixed dyslipidemia (Fredrickson Types IIa and IIb). Atorvastatin is indcated as adjunctive therapy to diet for the treatment of patients with elevated serum triglyceride levels (Fredrickson Type IV). Atorvastatin is indicated for the treatment of patients with primary dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III) who do not respond adequately to diet. Atorvastatin is also indicated to reduce total-C and LDL-C in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia as an adjunct to other lipid-lowering treatments (e.g., LDL apheresis) or if such treatments are unavailable. Therapy with lipid-altering agents should be a component of multiple-risk-factor intervention in individuals at increased risk for atherosclerotic vascular disease due to hypercholesterolemia. Lipid-altering agents should be used in addition to a diet restricted in saturated fat and cholesterol only when the response to diet and other nonpharmacological measures has been inadequate (see National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Guidelines, summarized in TABLE 5). Acid Reflux: http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic857.htm Note that certain foods and obesity *can* decrease the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, but there is no guarantee. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon |
Perception
Simple Simon wrote:
"otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... What kind of drugs are you on, anyhow? BG Lipitor and prilosec .... you? (EG save the stupid lecture, not interested) Aren't those for heartburn? If so get rid of 'em and start eating right and you won't have heartburn. Typical American attitude - don't bother changing bad habits, simply counteract them with drugs. S.Simon Neal, ever heard of the H-pylori bacteriun? Cheers Marty |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com