| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
NO WMD
"Horvath" wrote in message ... On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:00:29 GMT, wrote this crap: Answer one question. When Hans Blix was looking for proof of this, why was he thwarted every step of the way? it seem reasonable that if Saddam had disposed of his weapons, then he would have had proof, and he would have gladly shown it to Hans Blix, therefore complying with the UN resolutions. I'll wait for your answer, but I won't hold my breath. Saddam destroyed his WMD's a long time ago. He eliminated the proof that he had destroyed them because he hoped to bluff the U.S. out of attacking by pretending that he still had them. DUH! So if I rob a bank, then dispose of the money, then I go and TELL everyone I robbed a bank, and end up in jail, then I'm better off? You'd be better off if you could construct a decent simile! Regards Donal -- |
Threaded Mode
