Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Derrick Parfitt wrote in
: On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:08:14 +0100, "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" wrote: "Derrick Parfitt" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:39:47 +0100, "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" wrote: "Derrick Parfitt" wrote in message .. . On 16 Sep 2003 07:19:45 -0700, (Doug Freyburger) wrote: Let me get this straight. You're supporting a repeat offender child buggerer, right? Wow. No, I do not support the "child buggerers" actions. He has been dealt with by the authorities. It should be left at that. And when he gets out you're happy that nobody in the Asatru community knows what he did, and will almost inevitably do again? You are right. I stand corrected. Everyone should be notified of what the child molester has done. My displeasure was with the fact that outlawery can be applied haphazardly and for personal or political gain. This was not the case in the present situation with the child molester. Well, most of the cases of 'outlawry' that I've heard of in the past have been a trivialisation of that ancient punishment. In this case, however, I think it justified. Although, if one were to take it literally it would mean that any Asatruar who killed him would be subject to no opprobrium from those Asatruar who agreed with such a penalty. You are correct. Any reprisal against this child molester cannot be done. Well, it can , but the potential rath of the authorities will probably prevent anything happening to this person. Aww, Djirkie could do a swastie painting! Bertie |