About Us

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in
gy.com:

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in
gy.com:

"Shockwave Rider Clause" wrote in message
news:Xns93CAE5AA3D5FAspamspamspamspamspam@bedoper. com...
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in
gy.com:

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
.. .
Shockwave Rider Clause wrote in
news:Xns93CAD15F99995spamspamspamspamspam@bedoper. com:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in
:

Shockwave Rider Clause wrote in
news:Xns93CACEC5B1798spamspamspamspamspam@bedoper. com:

(Ron Harvey) wrote in
om:

Bolo The Stinky Clown wrote in
message
4.187...
(Ron Harvey) wrote in
om:

Bolo The Stinky Clown wrote in
message
4.187
...
wrote in
news:vlnbivcrihtq0bt1b9gr1ocnd4c6crijl1@ 4ax.com:

.....

And what facts would that be?

The lack of a right hand side engine? Even disinfo guy
Ron Harvey is now laughing at you.

Really?

I would presently scowl at you.

So please cut the "disinfo guy" crap.

Shut the **** up, disinfo guy.

What a abusively psychotic little ****** you are.

Dou eat your own **** for an encore?

There's my little PKB-Boy.

Would this then be the right hand engine that many
witnesses saw for
themselves,

Oh, really? Where did they see it?

As it flew by. Frank Probst had to dive it hitting him.

And then it disappeared? Is this the engine that also took
off a Jeep Cherokee antenna?

; )

What of the witness that said the vertical stabilizer hit a
sign?

Or the "prop plane"?

****head. I'm not interested in hearsay, I'm asking about
physical fact. Proof. Truth. Brush up on it.

Dodged by Bernie & Co.

and also what it did to the electricity genertaor in
front of the Pentagon and the tree behind it?

Before it disappeared? The nutjob you are defending says
it flew over the Pentagon. Do you believe this as well?

I defend no nutjob.

You're the nutjob.

Oooookay, Peewee.

While that is they also saw what the other engine did
to the wall of
the steam vault nearby, both of which effects you may
see for yourself if you bother to look carefully enough
at the photos taken on the day.

You are describing a 200 foot wide spread of damage, now.
That is one big 757.

Why is there no 757 in the video stills, Ron?

Probably because the supposed "video stills" were not
"video stills".

Hahahahahaha. What are they, genius? Why is there no 757 in
the *thingies*?

Dodged by Bernie & Co.

And what is that white plume of smoke about, again?

About pixels in a heavily compressed .jpg image; a Rosarch
test.

Ralphie says it is a vapor trail from a 757.

Dodged by Bernie & Co.

Nope.

Oh, and Bertie the
Bunyip, Usenet's leading authority on everything.

Nice to be acknowledged in one's own lifetime.

Oh, did I mention I was a 757 Captain?

Bertie

Then why do you make 757 captains look like drooling enema
drinkers?

Because it makes morons like you froth at the mouth.

The
fact that you're a pilot (allegedly) means about dick if you
can't give straight answers to simple questions. Troll or
not.

I can, but I don't bother,

not with someone who doesn't want to know.
Not capable of understanding/comprehending is a better statement
of his intellectual/learning/comprehension abilities IMHO.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type

I'm dismissing you and Bertie, Ralphie. Have another drink.

--
Can I borrow a feeling?
Just because you do not have the intellect/comprehensive ability to
grasp thins technical regarding a/c, don't run off. Stay,
read.absorb. eventually you may learn something about a/c.

I very much doubt that he can.
Certainly nothing that doesn't fit in with his looney theories,
anyway.

Bertie
Subscribe

I agree wiht this post.

Bertie

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
( OT )_The new Pentagon papers	Jim	General	2	March 10th 04 09:22 PM

Menu

About Us