| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the original figure is with an empty boat that floats
much higher up in the water. Even then I think the LWL would be greater than 22 feet, though. Another thing is the shoal keel is about five hundred pounds heaver than the stantard keel so mine, which is a shoal keel, floats deeper in the water to begin with even when not loaded for cruising and living aboard. "Wally" wrote in message ... "Simple Simon" wrote in message Finally, a voice of reason. Thank you Wally. Can't argue with the numbers. If the 22' is an original Coronado spec, I can only assume that it was a typo or a misreading of a handwritten note. What amazes me is that nobody thought to question it until now. You must have had one of those "wait a minute, that's not right..." moments. -- Wally I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty! www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Whacky design thought | General | |||
| Threats to lakes grow faster than cures: More bad news | General | |||
| Another happy Coronado owner checks in. | ASA | |||
| Faster than fast...? | ASA | |||
| Just when you thought it was safe . . .. | ASA | |||