Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the original figure is with an empty boat that floats
much higher up in the water. Even then I think the LWL would be greater than 22 feet, though. Another thing is the shoal keel is about five hundred pounds heaver than the stantard keel so mine, which is a shoal keel, floats deeper in the water to begin with even when not loaded for cruising and living aboard. "Wally" wrote in message ... "Simple Simon" wrote in message Finally, a voice of reason. Thank you Wally. Can't argue with the numbers. If the 22' is an original Coronado spec, I can only assume that it was a typo or a misreading of a handwritten note. What amazes me is that nobody thought to question it until now. You must have had one of those "wait a minute, that's not right..." moments. -- Wally I demand rigidly-defined areas of uncertainty! www.art-gallery.myby.co.uk |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Whacky design thought | General | |||
Threats to lakes grow faster than cures: More bad news | General | |||
Another happy Coronado owner checks in. | ASA | |||
Faster than fast...? | ASA | |||
Just when you thought it was safe . . .. | ASA |