"Horvath" wrote in message ...
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 17:17:16 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

The unemployment rate is about 6.5, the highest in 9 years.

9 years huh? That would be when Clinton was in office.


Exactly what I've been trying to get through their thick skulls.

The economy is always good when a Democrat is President
because that's the way the liberal media reports it even though
it might be in serious trouble.

Given the same conditions of unemployment when a Republican
is President, the liberal media reports gloom and doom and
the worst this and the worse that and don't even give people
credit for being able to do the math. Instead of saying the
unemployment percentage is higher than any time since the
Clinton years, they say it hasn't been that high in nine years
which happens to early in Clinton's term of office. Duh. Can
you say, "Step on your own dick?"

When people become so blinded by rage and hate because
their party has lost elections and lost favor with the American
people that they no longer understand that most of what they
read in newspapers or hear on TV is political rhetoric then it
means they are puppets doing the bidding of the politicians.

This is sad because a bunch of Democrat puppets is exactly
what the Democrat puppet masters (liberal leaders) have
been working for all these years.

What about them? They were a disgrace. In Clinton's
last year in office the economy started into a recession
that lasted for three quarters and the Democrats covered
it up. Clinton's big tax increases combined with 9-11 and
the normal but unpredictable business cycle all combined
to create the short recession that Bush inherited and has
worked hard to end and has ended. It's onward and
upwards from here.

You Democrats can attempt to re-write history all you want
but you cannot change the time table.


"Vito" wrote in message ...
Simple Simon wrote:

As for the facts of the jobless rate, the jobless rate was 5.8
percent - only 6/10 of one percent greater when Wm. Clinton
was in office for two years ...

What about Slick Willy's last few years?

Well, maybe we'll go to negative interest rates. You should
be a business professor! HAHAHAHAHAH

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 17:17:16 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

The unemployment rate is about 6.5, the highest in 9 years.

9 years huh? That would be when Clinton was in office.


Exactly what I've been trying to get through their thick skulls.

The economy is always good when a Democrat is President
because that's the way the liberal media reports it even though
it might be in serious trouble.

Given the same conditions of unemployment when a Republican
is President, the liberal media reports gloom and doom and
the worst this and the worse that and don't even give people
credit for being able to do the math. Instead of saying the
unemployment percentage is higher than any time since the
Clinton years, they say it hasn't been that high in nine years
which happens to early in Clinton's term of office. Duh. Can
you say, "Step on your own dick?"

When people become so blinded by rage and hate because
their party has lost elections and lost favor with the American
people that they no longer understand that most of what they
read in newspapers or hear on TV is political rhetoric then it
means they are puppets doing the bidding of the politicians.

This is sad because a bunch of Democrat puppets is exactly
what the Democrat puppet masters (liberal leaders) have
been working for all these years.

Simple Simon wrote:

As for the facts of the jobless rate, the jobless rate was 5.8
percent - only 6/10 of one percent greater when Wm. Clinton
was in office for two years ...

What about Slick Willy's last few years?

Simple Simon wrote:

What about them?....

What about unemployment #s? You know the subject you brought up (see
below) remember?

You Democrats ....

Democrats? Sorry Simple but I voted Republican in every election since
1960, campaigned for Goldwater and Slippery Dick and was a dues paying
member of the GOP for decades. But that may be about to change. Like I
said, the only thing lower than a tax-and-spend Democrat is a
borrow-and-spend Republican. Morality? Clinton sold military secrets to
Red China. Reagan screwed Ford then sold out to Iran to embarass Carter
then let Ollie hang out to dry when he diverted some of the ill-gotten
$$$ to the Contras, remember? Which is worse, selling military stuff to
enemies and screwing interns or selling to enemies and screwing your
friends?


Simple Simon wrote:

As for the facts of the jobless rate, the jobless rate was 5.8
percent - only 6/10 of one percent greater when Wm. Clinton
was in office for two years ...

"Vito" wrote
What about Slick Willy's last few years?