Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, in general, with two similar designed
anchors, the heavier/larger will hold better. It's not a trick, Jeff. I was trying to isolate the wisdom of Neal's comment about weight. Neal said there's no subsitute for weight and he's correct. You'd have have to install factors that this statement did not contain to find it in error. RB |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You miss the point - while it is generally true the a heavier anchor of the same type will
hold better, it does not mean that using heavier gear leads to more secure holding than lighter gear. The Reductio Ad Absurdum is this: would a 20,000 pound Bruce anchor be better for your boat than a 60 pound Bruce? Clearly not - weight is not always better. The "old wisdom" is to use a heavy CQR - usually 45 pounds or more for a cruiser often with all chain. Indeed, many cruisers will say they feel quite secure with this heavy setup. The new wisdom is a lighter Delta or Spade, with lighter chain on a chain/nylon rode. It holds better, is easier setup, and much easier to recover. Thus, using a more modern anchor is a good substitue for weight. "CANDChelp" wrote in message ... Yes, in general, with two similar designed anchors, the heavier/larger will hold better. It's not a trick, Jeff. I was trying to isolate the wisdom of Neal's comment about weight. Neal said there's no subsitute for weight and he's correct. You'd have have to install factors that this statement did not contain to find it in error. RB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
VirtualTransat : free regatta in real time winds | Electronics | |||
VirtualTransat : free regatta in real time winds | Cruising | |||
VirtualTransat : free regatta in real time winds | Whitewater | |||
VirtualTransat : free regatta in real time winds | Electronics | |||
Isabel regains strength 160-195 mph winds | General |