Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() CANDChelp wrote: Purely out of interest, why do you see strangeness in that particular comment? (I will explain my interest, if you like). Donal displays his incredible lack of sailing knowledge at every turn. With a comment like his, it's easy to see why he bought into Beneteau ads. He found the 31 tough to steer? What boat is tough to steer when trimmed correctly. Answer: None, not even the 31 with it's cruising underbody. Please explain YOUR interest. RB No, I didn't interpret Donal's statement that way at all, for reason of my own sailing experience. Most of the boats I've sailed have been dinghies, or dinghy equivalents (which includes most trailer sailers, of course). Almost all have deep and powerful rudders, the extreme actually being FLying Tadpole the Light Schooner, where the swept area of the rudder is about 2/3rds the area of the fully down dagger board. As well as powerful, the rudder is way way aft and needs every bit of its 5 foot tiller for control in gusts on a reach when overcanvassed and mostly out of the water. Overall, the boat is instantly responsive to her helm, a polo pony, which one sails like a dinghy, always moving the helm slightly for optimising her path through wind and wave, and slaughtering the competition. From there one moves to Lady Kate, where to maintain the extreme shoal draft, the rudder is as shallow as can be got away with, endplate (wings) and all, and in the run of the boat, not projecting well below like a spade rudder. Now, the actual helm is not heavier, nor lighter, than Flying Tadpole, since the leverage has been calculated to more-or-less match the presumed helmsman effort. But the level and nature of the responsiveness is totally different from the sharp reesponses of Flying Tadpole. For starters, the rudder is not powerful enough to run counter to the sail set, whereas with flying Tadpole, one can get away briefly with doing something violent at the helm without bringing sails into play. For seconds, Lady Kate actually has to be moving slightly for the rudder to bite, whereas FT can be accelerated off with one rudder jiggle...but generally, one steers FLying Tadpole like the big dinghy she is (in common with most of the boats on this newsgroup). But applying the same helm techniques to Lady Kate is counterproductive, all one ends up with is aching shoulders. It took me a long time to adjust to the totally different feel and approach needed because of the small rudder factor. I find it not at all surprising that Donal on a brief encounter had difficulty adjusting. -- Flying Tadpole ------------------------- Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace! http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dutch tall ship causes acute embarrassment | General | |||
Do you hear them..? BOOM BOOM BOOM! The drums of war grow louder. | ASA | |||
Donal Hates Your Boat | ASA | |||
Oh Danny Boy! | ASA | |||
Hey Bobby! Upset??? | ASA |