Why do you say my boat is better than any other? I'll admit it is better than any I've
seen for my purposes (and for about 100 other families) but I don't understand how you can
make a blanket judgment that one boat is better than another, especially one of a totally
different design.


"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
For example, although I have the
most beautiful, fastest and highest quality boat here, I don't feel the
need to say that it is so comapred to ***'s boat.

You just said you're boat is the best. Period. Sadly, both Jeff's and Mooron's
are better. I'm not sure that the older Farr is even up to the standard of a
C&C or Express for that matter.
Great troll for the most part!

RB

I can't recall Donal ever making any dispariging comments about MY boat.

Who are you talking about?


--
Scotty
S/V Lisa Marie
Balt. MD USA

while thoseExpress 30's are too old

That makes your ride prehistoric.


S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
Trains are a winter sport

while thoseExpress 30's are too old

That makes your ride prehistoric.

It's funny that Loco thinks that some dviding line of age seperates our boats.
They're both OLD, loco. Yours is faster. Mine is better looking and more
comfortable and worth more!

Hoooh ahhhh! He can't resist!

RB

,It's funny that Loco thinks that some dviding line of age seperates our
boats.
They're both OLD, loco. Yours is faster. Mine is better looking and more
comfortable and worth more!.

That's because there IS a big dividing line Boobie. There was a BIG change
in hull designs between your boat and mid eighties boats. Walk thru any
boatyard and start looking at bottoms instead of counting berths and stove
burners. Your boat is no more comfy by the way.
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
Trains are a winter sport

There was a BIG change
in hull designs between your boat and mid eighties boats.

Agreed. The early 80's was horrible, as designers stumbled. The 60's, 70's and
90's were far better for designs.

RB

I have a 35 y/o 12' daysailer with a torn mainsail.

BWhaahahahahaha! What a loser!


RB

but I don't understand how you can
make a blanket judgment that one boat is better than another, especially one of
a totally
different design.

I don't. Donal and MC do. In fact MC has just posted that his boat is the BEST
QUALITY. He made no qualifications. I've NEVER said my boat was the best. Only
neal and MC have!

Busted, baby!

RB

So tell us where the heads are -are aft by the master berth in both?

Hooh ahhh as you say

Cheers MC

Bobsprit wrote:
Look at the plans Booby. Are you really saying you think they are similar?

Yup. And so does everyone I've spoken to on the C&C lists. The 99 evolved out
of the 110 and the new C&C designers looked very hard at the 34 XL and R boats.
I've been checking out these boats for a while.
As cruisers, they all fall into the "modern, high performance" arena.
Now if I had said I'm choosing between a C&C 34 R and a Catalina 35, you'd have
a point!

Soooorrrrry!!!! Hooh ahhh!

RB

So tell us where the heads are -are aft by the master berth in both?

Good lord!!!! Bwahahahahahaha! Yeah, toilet placement really changes things!!!

You total fool!!!! Bwahahahahahaaha!

RB