Maybe you could go over there and
take your potshots at US servicemen from behind a rock.

Bush is getting American soldiers killed, a few at a time. Taking my comments
about Bush and applying at "as potshots on US servicemen" is pretty low, even
for you, loco.

RB

I am still delaying judgement. bobsprit, i'm not sure that
there's anybody on this group who knows quite how easy it would
be to "lose" a heap of things in a decent-sized deserts. Deserts
are big, and especially where there are mobile sandmasses: the
orbiting observations are just too limited (TMI, and weather
mucks things up). And the better the resolution, the more the
information overload and the easier to miss things. To give an
indication: in some desert landscapes, when it's done right, an
entire seismic convoy, thumping and banging away, can lay in a
seismic grid which is almost invisible to satellite, despite the
number of vehicles involved, without the benefit of useful
sandstorms.

So in a dust/sandstormy desert, it would be quite easy to move a
few shipping containers secretly and without trace. Whether it
was done or not is another matter, but it is entirely possible.
So I'm waiting.

(And if there's another desert ecologist in the group, feel
welcome to shoot, otherwise shut up.)

Flying Tadpole

Bobsprit wrote:

Boob**** get off the subject. Like a guy said on the radio today it's like
looking for 4 suitcases in the state of California.

It's NOTHING like 4 suitcases. The size, weight and dangerous factors of the
material would make it impossible to move "secretly" in 6 weeks without a
trace.

RB

Your potshots are primarily against intelligence and
common sense . . .

You and your liberal ilk are just so transparent.

You whine and all you do is whine. It's pathetic.

Figure out the negative side of any situation and you
have just figured out how a liberal operates and will
operate in the future. For example if we don't fight a
war you liberals whine and say Senior Bush should
have gone all the way and taken out Saddam.

If Senior Bush did continue Desert Storm and took
out Saddam you would have complained that the
UN resolutions did not give him permission to do
so and called him a warmonger.

When the UN inspectors were engaged in their
cluster **** you whined that they need more time
to find the weapons. Never once was heard the
claim that there were no WMDs. When our personnel
are looking for the WMDs you say, "Two months
is plenty enough time, there are no WMDs?"

I could go on and on but the point is you have no
credibility because everyone sees you trying to
have it both ways at the same time. It doesn't
cut the mustard.







"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
Maybe you could go over there and
take your potshots at US servicemen from behind a rock.

Bush is getting American soldiers killed, a few at a time. Taking my comments
about Bush and applying at "as potshots on US servicemen" is pretty low, even
for you, loco.

RB

Especially since Bush himself has been overtly goading the enemy to "bring it
on". What a total ****up!

On this we are in agreement. Playing cowboy with American lives...Bush is pure
garbage. And a liar.

RB

say Senior Bush should
have gone all the way and taken out Saddam.

It seems that NO bush can take out Saddam, who lives on as Bush dares Iraqis to
take more US lives.
And that's what they're doing.

RB

FT,

I'm kind of like you Tad, but Nutsy does make some pretty strong points.
The points he makes, about they were never there shouldn't be that hard
to disprove. After all, we did go to war being assure there was proof of
their existence. If there was proof, I would like to see it. Even if it
was wrong, let's see what was thought to be WMD. I would like to see
what it was that caused us to spend Billions of taxpayers money and
justified the killing that took place and is taking place right now.

Shutting up about it has got to be wrong! Prove there was a reason to
take control of another country ( Other than Oil!) I also woul like to
see a little more effort to find Saddam, also Bin Laden. Let's be
informed of what is being done.

I want to believe. I did truly believe, as this group can attest to, in
the beginning. Now, the Admin. is admitting to lying. I damn well don't
like it

The Party in power made a big thing about Clinton getting Blowjobs but
no one was killed and it didn't cost the country a tenth of what these
lies are costing us

Ole Thom

You people just don't get it do you? What a bunch of simpering
wimps and morons you all are!

First off, you have proven that no matter the scenario you will
complain so what's the use of hurrying to attempt to please you
or answer your questions and cater to your whims?

If we find WMDs you will claim they were planted.
If we don't find WMDs you will say they never existed.

When former and impeached President Clinton said there
were WMDs you agreed even though Clinton was convicted
of perjury ("lying under oath", for those of you living in New York)
When President Bush says there were WMDs you yell, "Liar".
even when there is not one single solitary proven example of
Mr. Bush having lied.

If we don't find WMDs fast enough to meet with your approval
you claim they don't exist. If we find 100 pounds of uranium
or anthrax you will say that isn't enough. You say mobile
weapons labs mean nothing. You say centrifuges to enrich
uranium don't count. You say the specialized aluminum tubes
to hold centrifuge contents don't count. You say uranium itself
doesn't mean anything. You say precursors to biologicals don't
count. You say elevated levels of chemical weapons in the rivers
don't count. You say gassed Kurds don't count.

Even if we found a million pounds of chemical and biologicals
you will still say it's a lie because the quantity is too great.

If we take your whining and complaining and stick it right up your
ass you will say it was rape. If we ask your permission to do so
beforehand you will say OK but then you will whine and complain
that you did not have all necessary information as to the consequences
and it really hurt and we should have given you more facts. If we
spent two weeks giving you all the facts you would complain we
are taking up too much of your time giving you the facts.

Fact the facts, you are chronic compainers and nothing else but.

You say you support the troops but you constantly disparage
their efforts and their sacrifice. You continue to undermine
their morale and you continue to endanger their lives with
your idiotic criticism of their Commander in Chief. You say
you love our country but you hate it's leaders. You are too
stupid to realize the two are inseparable.

Why would you actually think anyone regards you and all
liberals as other than anti-American, whining, complaining,
nagging assholes who take a negative stand on every issue
and NEVER, NEVER EVER offer anything constructive?



"Thomas Stewart" wrote in message ...
FT,

I'm kind of like you Tad, but Nutsy does make some pretty strong points.
The points he makes, about they were never there shouldn't be that hard
to disprove. After all, we did go to war being assure there was proof of
their existence. If there was proof, I would like to see it. Even if it
was wrong, let's see what was thought to be WMD. I would like to see
what it was that caused us to spend Billions of taxpayers money and
justified the killing that took place and is taking place right now.

Shutting up about it has got to be wrong! Prove there was a reason to
take control of another country ( Other than Oil!) I also woul like to
see a little more effort to find Saddam, also Bin Laden. Let's be
informed of what is being done.

I want to believe. I did truly believe, as this group can attest to, in
the beginning. Now, the Admin. is admitting to lying. I damn well don't
like it

The Party in power made a big thing about Clinton getting Blowjobs but
no one was killed and it didn't cost the country a tenth of what these
lies are costing us

Ole Thom

There are more people murdered in Washington D.C. daily
than soldiers in Iraq. Grow up bloomer boy! We've still
got a job to do and whining about what it takes to get
it done doesn't get it. Give our troops some credit instead
of berating their sacrifices in protecting your sorry ass.

Only a fool would walk out on a commitment like
you suggest we do.

wrote in message ...
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:44:50 -0400, "Simple Simon" wrote:


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
Especially since Bush himself has been overtly goading the enemy to "bring it
on". What a total ****up!

On this we are in agreement. Playing cowboy with American lives...Bush is pure
garbage. And a liar.

If Americans approve of George W. Bush at an over 60% rate what
does that say about the Democrats he defeated?

I guess it means Americans would rather vote garbage and
liars into office than Democrats. Ha aha hhah ah ah haha ha!

You take a beating with every ignorant statement you make.


Latest polls show the majority think that the causualty count is unacceptably
high. In other words, they feel it was a wasted effort for what we gained.

http://www.costofwar.com

BB

He doesn't have to try. Fags naturally are drawn to each other.

wrote in message ...


Don't try to make me like you, please. It will spoil all our fun.

According to Bush and his people, a great deal of the materials were in
populated areas which are well watched. Where are they now? .

It was hidden or poured down the river.

Where are the warheads?

They already found 20 different piles of warheads. Watch the news.

Where are the millions of gallons of nerve agents?

Nobody ever said there were millions of gallons. Secondly experts believe
the stuff was poured in the river. Read the paper/watch the news.

Most importantly, if Saddam had all of the deadly stuff, why didn't he
lay
waste to the US troops with it???

That question was already answered a long time ago. He couldn't use the
stuff because he was trying to get world opinion on his side. Read the
paper/watch the news.
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
Trains are a winter sport