It is not specifics that define the rule but the preponderance
of evidence.

Please direct us to specific evidence of a preponderance nature. That implies
MANY coumented cases of cruising cats suffering damage.
Let's see it!

RB

You forget that I am a sailor

You claim to be a sailor, while making remarks that demonstrate little more
than a large collection of cruising world back issues.
You have yet to provide a large cache of evidence demonstrating that multi hull
cruisers suffer during long passages.

RB

They don't suffer. They have all the comforts of home -
up until the point their home capsizes, that is!

Any boat with a stability curve that plunges straight down
at around fifty degrees should never be approved for offshore
voyaging. One of these days they are going to outlaw multi-
hulls as inherently unsafe. All it's going to take is a Kennedy,
Clinton, or Daschell to get killed on one and you will see
lawsuits and legislation and rightly so in this case even if
the victims are Democrats.



"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
You forget that I am a sailor

You claim to be a sailor, while making remarks that demonstrate little more
than a large collection of cruising world back issues.
You have yet to provide a large cache of evidence demonstrating that multi hull
cruisers suffer during long passages.

RB