What to love about the United States.
National Review Online:
July 14, 2003, Issue Spending with the Best of 'Em By Kevin A. Hassett Under the current Bush budget, federal spending will have increased by 19.6 percent over the first three years of the administration. Since government spending is growing much faster than the economy as a whole, the share of our national income devoted to Leviathan has increased markedly, from 18.4 percent to 19.9 percent. Cato Institute economist Veronique de Rugy notes that this dramatic surge is virtually unprecedented in the history of government spending in the U.S. According to de Rugy's research, three of the five biggest increases in government spending in history have all occurred during the first three years of the Bush administration; the other two occurred during the Second World War. That sounds pretty bad, but even these numbers undoubtedly understate the problem, since they do not account for the huge prescription-drug benefit President Bush is working hard to push through Congress. "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 15:18:04 GMT, "Gilligan" wrote this crap: What you have described here is America of the past. Let's take a look at the futu The law of the land, the US Constitution is becoming less and less relevant. Spending under the Bush administrations first three years has gone up 13.5%. The same time duration under Clinton only yielded an increase of 3.3%. Bull****. [all other bull**** deleted] Ave Imperator Bush! Bush Was Right! Four More Beers! |
What to love about the United States.
|
What to love about the United States.
hehehe, a piano in the bathroom brings a certain ambiguity to the phrase,
"working on a movement" Scout "Flying Tadpole" wrote in message ... Scout wrote: A fluffy cover would make a nifty stool softener. His forte is clearly puns delivered piano. |
What to love about the United States.
Responding to being labeled a whining gloom and doomer is not facilitated by more of the same. You only make your own life miserable by continued futile efforts at pretending you can make a difference by posting material that is else- where available to all who are concerned about such things. Put your own house in order. The house of the country and world will stand or fall no matter what you do. You may as well stop beating yourself about the head and shoulders and go wilderness hiking if that is what you enjoy. Accept the fact that the enlightened philosophy will not stand as long as there so many unenlightened. The time is not right for it. One must accept the cycles that occur in the natural order of time. Resistance is futile. You live in the wrong time for your endowments. They will not be appreciated in your lifetime. There is only one justification for what you do. Either you enjoy your gloom and doom or you don't. If you enjoy it then accept that you do and post your material with the understanding that it gives you pleasure to do so. Make this clear to the reader. Whether it is by design or by omission your posts appear to be the rantings of a very discontented man. For your own sake, if indeed you are discontented, choose a more pleasant path for yourself. Choose a path that gives you pleasure and fulfillment. Preaching to a choir of the willingly dependent will only serve to defeat you at every turn. Such as these don't want your help nor do they deserve it. Make no mistake, I only preach to the choir because the ideas and the presentation of the ideas gives me pleasure. I harbor no false hopes of ever changing the world. It does not heed my advice. I endeavor to enjoy as much as I am able those things the world provides that make life worth living. I have no time to waste trying to convert those who have no desire to be converted. If it ever gets to the point where gloom and doom is my constant state of mind then I will at least have the guts to put a gun to my head and rid the world of another unneeded impediment. There would be too much hypocrisy to otherwise bear. "Gilligan" wrote in message thlink.net... It's obvious which generation is the most important: Government Budget Spending Families have long been recognized as the basic foundation of every society. Children have long been recognized our hope for the future. There is little doubt that in today's society, families and our children are under extreme pressure from many sources. Politicians coined the term "family values," but most elected officials have ignored children's issues when they get to Congress. Our federal government has failed miserably in promoting and funding programs and ideals that strengthen the family. Just look at our government's failed "War on Drugs, the Tax Code, our declining Educational System, or the many liberal laws that have given us such things as abortion, no-fault divorce, a ban on prayer in schools, widespread pornography, violence on TV, state intrusion into family autonomy, etc. and the reasons for this pressure becomes obvious. For those GPs on that advocate GP "forced visitation" laws and use as their argument their concern for the "best interests and welfare of the children", here's your chance to help, your chance to put you money where your mouth is. A study of federal spending, using the U.S. Federal Budget reveals some interesting facts. One glaring inequity that stands out is the fact that while the government often gives lip service to their concern for our children, they fail miserably when it comes to providing the funding and programs necessary to help. As we all know, the Federal Government is quick to tax and spend, but it is how the money is spent that is quite revealing. The federal government currently spends more than five times more on programs and entitlements for Americans over 65 than it spends on children, even though there are twice as many children as elderly. If this isn't shocking enough, how about this. The lion's share of this money spent on the elderly is not even means tested. This means the money is just doled out without verifying whether it is needed. What's even more shocking is that organizations that purport to support our children, are in fact partners in this injustice. Let's just look at one such organization's (the NEA) legislative program agenda. In a study, John Berthoud, Vice President of the Alexis de Toqueville Institution, revealed that "If every item in the National Education Association's (NEA) Legislative Program for the 104th Congress were enacted, federal spending would increase by at least $702 billion annually." The study uses data on legislative proposals compiled by the National Taxpayers Union Foundation in their BillTally tracking system. The spending estimates for the different proposals come from non-partisan sources such as the Congressional Budget Office. One of the findings in this report is that the NEA's spending priorities are heavily skewed towards elderly Americans, despite NEA's claim that it is an educational organization with a primary focus on schools and children. The study finds that "for each dollar in new spending on children and education that the NEA proposes (over $24 billion annually), it advocates $5.24 in new spending on Social Security". The report also claims "that the taxes to fund the NEA agenda are probably politically impractical. According to the report, the NEA would need over thirteen times as much in taxes as was raised by the 1993 budget package". Berthoud points out, "no organization that advocates this massive expansion of federal spending and probably massive increase in deficits can claim to be helping children. This agenda will break the financial back of America's future generations." If that isn't shocking enough for you, let's examine the U.S. Budget and see how the government actually spent its money on areas affecting children, families, and the elderly. The source for this data is the U.S. Budget FY 1998, Historical Tables, OMB Feb. 1997, and The Economic and Budget Outlook FY 1998-2007, CBO, Jan. 1997) In the postwar era entitlements have grown rapidly. Nearly all of this growth has been due to age-based retirement and health-care programs, not programs targeted to children, youth, families, the unskilled, the unemployed, or poor. Entitlements are cash or in-kind payments to (or on behalf of) individuals that are not contractually linked to payments or services received by the government in return. The federal government distributes most entitlement benefits directly, but some are disbursed through grants to state and local authorities. The entitlements outlay category includes only benefit payments; it excludes the cost of program administration. Federal entitlement spending $35.4 billion 1996 $914.4 billion 1996 FY Federal spending Entitlements $914.4 billion 58.6% Defense $265.7 billion 17.0% Interest $241.1 billion 15.5% All Other $139.1 billion 8.9% ------------------ 1560.3 billion Over the postwar era, entitlements have been the fastest-growing category of federal spending, rising from under half to more than triple the size of defense, and far outstripping the growth of the economy. Actual Federal entitlement spending FY 1965 $35.9 billion FY 1996 $914.4 billion Retirement and health-care programs that primarily benefit older Americans account for virtually all the expansion, and today comprise four-fifths of all federal entitlement spending. FY 1996 Federal entitlement spending Food and housing $62.3 billion 6.8% Cash welfare $62.7 billion 6.9% Other non-retirement $60.2 billion 6.6% Health benefits $308.0 billion 33.7% Federal pensions $74.4 billion 8.1% Social security $346.8 billion 37.9% ----------------- $914.4 billion The lion's share of federal entitlement dollars is paid out without regard to financial need. FY 1996 Federal entitlement spending Means tested $218.2 billion 23.9% Partially means tested $36.1 billion 4.0% Non-means tested $660.1 billion 72.2% --------- $914.4 billion Means-tested entitlements are those for which recipients must demonstrate some degree of financial need. They include AFDC, SSI, the EITC, Food Stamps, and Medicaid. Non-means-tested entitlements do not consider financial need in determining eligibility; instead, eligibility is based on categorical requirements, such as age, disability, or prior employment. Non-means-tested entitlements include Social Security, Medicare, federal civilian and military retirement, Unemployment Insurance, and farm price supports. Partly means-tested entitlements (mainly veterans' health care and student loans) sometimes consider financial need in determining eligibility, but according to rules that do not apply to all benefits granted. Of all government benefit dollars, less than one out of seven serves to raise Americans out of poverty. Indeed, federal entitlements are as likely to benefit the affluent as the needy. Although only one in eight Americans is aged sixty-five or older, the elderly receive three-fifths of all federal entitlements. Federal entitlements by age group FY 1996 Ages under 18 $88.5 billion 9.7% Ages 18-64 $234.1 billion 25.4% Ages 65 and older $557.0 billion 60.9% Ages unknown $34.9 billion 3.8% ----------------- $914.4 billion Federal benefits to the elderly have grown dramatically in recent decades and, in per capita dollars, now dwarf benefits going to other age groups. Per capita entitlements by age group FY 1996 Ages under 18 $1,282.00 Ages 18-64 $1,442.00 Ages 65 and older $16,451.00 Even including nonentitlement outlays, per capita federal spending on the elderly towers 9 to 1 over per capita spending on children. The United states has gained a troubling distinction among developed nations: In no other country do government benefits so favor the old. Now you're probably thinking, "But they need it right?" Sort of the same myth as poor old grannie being denied visitation and the cookies getting cold. Let's look.. The myth about widespread senior poverty to the contrary, the elderly rank about average in comparison to all households in per capita cash income. Per capita before-tax cash income by household type in FY 1996. All households $18,250 Elderly households $17,197 Households with children $13,692 Single mother households $ 7,385 Households w/o children $24,584 Please note the elderly is 25.6% greater than households with children. 1996 Federal tax liability for a working couple and an elderly couple with $30,000 income Working couple $6,938 Elderly couple $690 Beyond income, the elderly have advantages in financial assets, where they do better than any younger age group. Average household financial net worth by age group in 1993 Under age 35 $7,950 Ages 35-44 $35,081 Ages 45-54 $35,073 Ages 55-64 $56,727 Ages 65 & older $61,946 Average household total net worth by age group in 1993 Under age 35 $30,144 Ages 35-44 $93,598 Ages 45-54 $125,856 Ages 55-64 $169,491 Ages 65 & older $151,681 The elderly also enjoy high rates of homeownership, which are declining for the young but still rising for seniors. Homeownership rates by age group 1995 Under age 25 14.20% Ages 25-34 44.80% Ages 34-44 65.20% Ages 45-64 77.25% Ages 65 and older 77.80% As for health care, the share of Americans without insurance declines dramatically with age. Percentage of persons without health insurance in 1995 as a percentage of all persons in their age group. Under age 18 14.8% Ages 18-24 28.9% Ages 25-34 22.3% Ages 35-44 16.3% Ages 45-54 13.7% Ages 55-64 13.8% Ages 65 and older 1.1% This information is from a study done by NEIL HOWE AND RICHARD JACKSON for the National Taxpayers Union. These statistics clearly show that lobbying efforts by senior citizen organizations have been quite successful in "providing" for entitlements for the elderly, with the lion's share not being means tested. They also show that many elderly people should be means tested for they not only receive the lion's share of the entitlements by are also the best off financially. The most alarming statistics show how much is allocated to seniors that least need it, and how little is allocated to children, families, and the poor, that most need it. My challenge to all grandparents and parents that are "truly" concerned about the best interests of children is to call your congressmen and demand means testing for entitlements. Demand that the entitlements are taken away from those that do not need them and reallocated to those that do, mainly the children and the poor. This could be don without even raising taxes and we could do something for our children. Here's your chance to put your money where your mouth is. Our children are counting on you. |
What to love about the United States.
hehehe, a piano in the bathroom brings a certain ambiguity to the phrase, "working on a movement" Scout Don't give Timmy ideas...he's bad enough all on his own.... -- katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit. http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
What to love about the United States.
Scout wrote: hehehe, a piano in the bathroom brings a certain ambiguity to the phrase, "working on a movement" Scout I trust you are familiar with the .asa cedar bucket signature songs. Inspired by Capt Neal's finest hour. ANd now driven by the DTs, I'll put a sung version of the first up on mp3 in the near future, but it will take them some time to check the lyrics out. http://www.ace.net.au/schooner/asapo.htm#Catfish http://www.ace.net.au/schooner/asapo.htm#Scatfish Flying Tadpole |
What to love about the United States.
Yeah, but you're a freak of nature.
"Horvath" wrote in message ... On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 16:28:26 -0400, "katysails" wrote this crap: and where plumbers take their families on vacation to Europe. Our plumber lives in a 250K house and has a cottage on the lake and still takes extravagant vacations. Our electrician has an even more expensive house, a second house on the lake and a 30 foot motor boat. I pity those people who have such small houses and small boats. Ave Imperator Bush! Bush Was Right! Four More Beers! |
What to love about the United States.
On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 21:42:05 GMT, "Gilligan"
wrote this crap: 2003 Budget Completes Big Jump in Spending By Glenn Kessler Washington Post Staff Writer Monday, April 15, 2002; Page A01 That was over a year ago, dumbass. Ave Imperator Bush! Bush Was Right! Four More Beers! |
What to love about the United States.
Taddy,
It just keeps getting better and better! I can only hope you are sharing your wonderful talents outside of asa! Scout "Flying Tadpole" wrote I trust you are familiar with the .asa cedar bucket signature songs. Inspired by Capt Neal's finest hour. ANd now driven by the DTs, I'll put a sung version of the first up on mp3 in the near future, but it will take them some time to check the lyrics out. http://www.ace.net.au/schooner/asapo.htm#Catfish http://www.ace.net.au/schooner/asapo.htm#Scatfish Flying Tadpole |
What to love about the United States.
er...you mean there's something outside of asa?
FT Scout wrote: Taddy, It just keeps getting better and better! I can only hope you are sharing your wonderful talents outside of asa! Scout "Flying Tadpole" wrote I trust you are familiar with the .asa cedar bucket signature songs. Inspired by Capt Neal's finest hour. ANd now driven by the DTs, I'll put a sung version of the first up on mp3 in the near future, but it will take them some time to check the lyrics out. http://www.ace.net.au/schooner/asapo.htm#Catfish http://www.ace.net.au/schooner/asapo.htm#Scatfish Flying Tadpole |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com