On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:15:01 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/23/14, 8:59 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 20:49:02 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:11:56 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/22/14, 5:10 PM, Poco Loco wrote:

The 'highly paid' team was not a US National Hockey League team. It is a team comprised of players
from many (if not all) of the National Hockey League teams. They get together as a US Olympic Team
once every four years.

Of course, you knew that, eh?


And therefore it is the highly paid U.S. - National Hockey League team,
a team comprised of highly paid players in the National Hockey League.

He is pointing out that they are not a team and teamwork may be worth
more than individual performance in hockey.


He gets it. He's just embarrassed after his praise of the socialist 'amateurs'.



Not at all. You should know by know that I really don't give a rat's ass
what you righties think or, I should say, what you have been programmed
to think, and my interest in the Olympics is about on par with my
interest in golf.

Well, you came up with some very profound comments about how the socialist amateurs beat the USA
paid hockey players. I was astounded at the interest you expressed.

But, you rather screwed that one up, eh?


Shouldn't you be over at the gun shoppe, buying another pistol and ankle
holster in case someone takes away your main battle gun while you walk
over to Safeway?

I see no reason to try and match the number of guns you say you own.