On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 18:01:05 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 2/16/2014 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung
on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so
quick to pronounce guilt.


Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking
on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one
who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him
convicted for the crime he committed: murder.


Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors
planned on a new trial on the murder charge.

Yes, and yes.

But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen.



I don't know much about this and only saw some brief coverage of some of
his testimony and his girlfriend's (think it's his girlfriend)
testimony that basically contradicted much of his.

It struck me that he appeared to have been well coached in answering
questions in a way that would support a "stand your ground" defense.
But there were other things like not reporting the incident right away
and other actions that make me at least question the veracity of his
statements.


I haven't watched it. Have paid little attention to the news reports about it. I just think it's
humorous for the righteous among us to be judge, jury, and all-but executioner.