On 2/16/2014 4:28 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:34:27 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 3:29 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:13:26 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 2/16/2014 3:00 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/16/14, 12:44 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:04:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/16/14, 12:00 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


BTW, Dunn was found guilty. Could get up to 60 years. Jury got hung
on the 'murder' rap. Must be
'bad Republican jury', eh?


He was not found guilty of murder. He should have been.

You liberals are strange. You want lenient punishments, but are so
quick to pronounce guilt.


Lenient punishment? What sort of right-wing chicken bone are you choking
on now? And who is talking about punishment? You are. You are the one
who brought up the possibility of a 60-year sentence. I wanted him
convicted for the crime he committed: murder.


Didn't that charge result in a hung jury? Last I heard the prosecutors
planned on a new trial on the murder charge.

Yes, and yes.

But, there's no need, in the minds of some, for a trial or a jury. He's guilty. Amen.



The bozo shot into a car of teenagers and killed one of them. There is
no disputing that. There is NO evidence whatsoever that any of the teens
were armed with a weapon or even that any of them got out of their car.

Sure there is, there is testimony... why do you always have to ask
questions filled with lies? Can't support your point any other way?

Hey, one of them might have said, "**** you, whitey," and I suppose in
Florida that is enough for "whitey" to shoot at them, eh?

Don't know. The jury, all racists as you say, was hung.

But, shouldn't you have him filtered, if he is what you say?

And, just 'cause there's no gun, doesn't mean it wasn't chucked out the window, right?