On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:29:04 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/14/14, 10:59 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:13:06 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/14/14, 1:12 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:34:04 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


The media knee jerked stand your ground commentary but I do not
believe Dunn's lawyer ever asserted it. They asserted a straight self
defense case..


You are missing the point. I'm not discussing the stupid SYG law as law,
but as the excuse armed morons in your state (and others) think of when
they decide to shoot up a car full of loud and maybe obnoxious kids or a
kid walking through a neighborhood. The law obviously lowers the
standard of the concept of self-defense.

What excuse do they use in Chicago and Detroit?

If you think the law lowers the burden of imminent threat you are just
another low information liberal, knee jerking over something you heard
on MSNBC.
It is very apparent that you never took any of the Florida CCW
classes. Did they even have an education requirement for that CCW you
have?



You still don't get it. I'm not talking about *the law* I am talking
about what the concept of "Stand Your Ground" apparently does to the
mindset of low intelligence gun carriers. It apparently plants the idea
in their skulls that they can shoot their way out of simple
disagreements or even a fist fight they might have started.

Oh, and taking CCW classes is a guarantee only that someone yawned their
way through a CCW class. I've taken three of them. There's nothing in
those classes that keeps a low intelligence hothead from skinning his
firearm if he gets "upset." Like, you know, loud music coming from a car
with some black teenagers in it.

You should have been a psychologist. Then all this talk of 'mindset of low intelligence gun
carriers' would have a lot more weight.

Just remember, it took you three tries to pass what just about any low intelligence gun carrier can
get through with one shot - or none if you're retired military or police.