posted to rec.boats
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,563
|
|
What a great country, eh?
On 2/4/2014 2:49 PM, Califbill wrote:
KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 5:54 PM, Califbill wrote:
KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 11:59 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:47:27 -0500, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote:
On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote:
I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma.
I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services
in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it
on everyone else through legislation.
Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns
trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be
covered or charged for abortions....
Isn't that what I just said?
I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same
question we don't bother asking him, show me?
When these groups push legislation that makes everyone follow their
pro life policies it "imposing".
So, asking for a reasonable time for a mom to decide is "imposing"? Is
that what you are talking about?
No, he is talking about the law requiring a doctor or hospital to do an
abortion on demand. No matter the beliefs of the doctor or hospital!
So, what you are saying is.... "The hospital not wanting to have imposed
on it the requirement to do abortions on demand, is somehow "imposing" on
the folks who choose to use their facility? Dumb....
No, I am saying a Catholic or other religious run hospital is forced to do
abortions on demand, despite their beliefs. The women could easily choose
another facility. That is willing to perform the procedure.
So, I am still trying to see where the "imposing" comes in...
|