On 2/4/14, 10:24 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2014 10:13 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/4/14, 10:09 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2014 10:03 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/4/14, 9:56 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2014 9:36 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/4/14, 9:25 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2014 9:11 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/4/14, 9:00 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2014 8:39 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/4/14, 8:33 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:38:31 -0800 (PST), Tim

wrote:

On Monday, February 3, 2014 12:26:03 PM UTC-6, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 1:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:05 -0500, Poco Loco


wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8



Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix,
maybe
everyone would be happier.



===



I'm happy to see you advocating reasonable solutions like
that. I

wish there were more like you.





Where are you looking.. There are lots of us. Problem is,
there
are
too

many who feel that if you are not for abortion up till two
weeks
after

birth, are considered, right wing nuts....

AND you're involved in some kind of an imaginary 'war on women'

?;^)

'War on women' is another buzz phrase the left is throwing out
for
the
consumption of fools who
believe whatever they hear. The problem is that 90% of the
liberals
fall into that mold.

It's no wonder the left wants to keep the population
uneducated as
much as possible.



Snerk. The GOPers claim there is no GOP war on women. That is
hilarious
b.s.



It's nothing more than a phrase coined by the left to further the
progressive agenda or to counter the opposing points of view of
the
right. Intellectual dishonesty at it's height.



When you force or try to force women into unnecessary procedures,
when
you make it impossible or very difficult to obtain abortions, when
you
try to restric access to birth control, when you refuse to endorse
equal
pay for equal work, you are waging a war on women. Period.


Right. Or Left. Or whatever. Any political party or person
trying to
get elected or retain their seats are going to "wage a war" on women
who
represent over 50 percent of the voters. Makes sense. Not.



No one said the GOP war on women made sense.


Word games. You know what I meant.



There's no question the GOP is waging war on women and womens' rights.
The list of horrors being perpetrated on women by Republicans is
practically endless. Surely you are not denying the facts. Got a
transvaginal probe device handy?


Those are the nutcases. The *GOP* is not "waging a war on women". It
would be political suicide.



There are plenty of GOP nutcases in high elective office in the states
and in the national government. They are the GOP.

As for committing political suicide, well, the GOP is doing quite well
with the changing demographics, eh?


I am sure you enjoy the ride while you can join other liberal
progressives in the high-fiving and cackling they engage in at the
moment. Past history shows that the voter's mood swings from left to
right and right to left however. Right now the mood is swinging back to
a more center position. If the proper GOP candidate emerges, your
assumption that Hillary is a shoe-in may be proven wrong. The mid-term
elections should give a good indication which way the wind is blowing.



Doubtful, since the GOP majority in the House survives only by
gerrymandering. That will not change for 2014, or probably 2016.

I have never claimed Hillary would be a shoo-in. As for a "proper" GOP
candidate, I don't see how one would slip through the GOP primaries.

--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.