View Single Post
  #25   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Windows XP users 'increasing'?

On Monday, February 3, 2014 3:14:06 PM UTC-6, HanK wrote:
On 2/3/2014 2:49 PM, wrote:

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:49:45 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:




On 2/3/14, 11:46 AM,
wrote:

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:04:24 -0500, Poco Loco


wrote:




Maybe I'll stick with XP even after the support stops.




http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/...are-in-january



Microsoft has not given their business users any compelling reason to


switch.


If your mission is not significantly changing, why should you change


your hardware and software?


99% of all real business applications ran just fine on Windows 3.1 on


a 396. If you are just doing bookkeeping, inventory and point of sale,


you don't need that much computing power.


All of these flashy graphics do not actually add much to the average


business man's operation.


Hardware is pretty stagnant these days so I am not really sure why


they need a different OS.








Apple offers incremental improvements to its OS, not do-overs, and its


price is right. Mavericks, the latest, costs $0.00. I was going to put


Win 7 on my Macbook Air, but for $100+, I simply decided not to waste


the money.




The OS is not free, it is just bundled into the overpriced hardware.


IBM did the same thing with the System 360, all the software was free


including on site support ... until LBJ sued them over it.




Apple gets away with it because they are still a small player.




Most people do not get the retail version of windows anyway. They get


it bundled with the software and it is about $35-40 that way based on


what you can get a bare (or linux) system for.




I don't even pay that. When you get an off lease machine the extra


cost is negligible and you could reinstall that OS on a brand new


machine if you wanted to. You just need the sticker ... or just the


numbers.


I am not even sure Microsoft is checking for duplicate XP


installations these days. I do have a good W-7 number if I wanted to


play with it but I have XP on that machine now.


I have still not seen a compelling need to go to 7 or 8.




I am not impressed with the idea that just being newer is always


better.




I just fired up a win 8.1 machine. So far everything is loading in

flawlessly, even the 1999 Mapsource from Garmin. I'm in the process of

loading the 2014 map data now. So far so good.


Can you do that on a Win7?