On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 13:36:48 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 2/3/2014 11:30 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:23:58 -0500, KC wrote:

On 2/2/2014 10:53 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:11:27 -0500, KC wrote:

Some of us just see a viable human being and
want to have a discussion as to when it's ok to kill that person...

You have no problem when they are 15 and just shot a cop.
I am just nipping it in the bud.


Wth does that have to do with anything?

If you look at who is in prisons, the majority came from families that
had an unmarried teenaged mom who was in the welfare system her whole
life.
If they aborted that first baby and got the girl back in school, there
is a far better chance she could have a productive life and not as
many criminal kids.



That's not the problem. The problem is the number of welfare mothers
motivated to have more and more kids because they generate additional
welfare payment amounts. The boyfriend, husband or daddy is nowhere to
be found typically.

About half the states in the country have passed family cap laws that
limit the number of kids that will generate additional welfare payments.
They are still qualified for Medicaid and additional food stamps but not
for outright cash payments for kids that number above the cap.


You should pluralize the 'boyfriends, husbands, or daddys'. Actually, you could probably leave
'husbands' out of the mix. In DC 80% of the newborns are to unwed mothers.