BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

F.O.A.D.

On 2/3/14, 8:24 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote:

On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 12:26:30 -0500, KC wrote:

On 2/2/2014 11:19 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 09:55:50 -0500, Hank wrote:

So, why do so many self-described pro-lifers oppose
free and accessible birth control?

For some it's a religious issue. Others believe it's an area that that
the govt. has no jurisdiction over. Free and accessible birth control is
fine so long as tax payers are not burdened with paying for it.

If you are actually a fiscal conservative you know money spent on
birth control and abortion comes back 100 fold in welfare and prison
costs you don't have to spend.
It is a very efficient use of public money. Birth control and abortion
should be part of any welfare package.

When a single 15 year old has a baby, it destroys 2 lives and they
become a burden on the rest of society, virtually every time.

The ONLY issue is religious.

Are you suggesting you can't have principals, beliefs, and morals,
without religion?

I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma.
I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services
in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it
on everyone else through legislation.

Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns
trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be
covered or charged for abortions....

Read it again:

"I have no problem with religious organizations *denying* these services
in their hospitals and as employers..."

Harry would insist that the Sisters of Charity perform abortions - free, of course.

Sorry, but I don't buy into the anti-abortion message. If you righties
are so pro life, why are you pushing for cutbacks in food stamps and
medical care for the poor?

--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.