On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:57:51 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Victim Of Dog-Authorized Anal Assault Receives $1.6 Million Settlement

http://tinyurl.com/mshgq8n

See above. That's how the story could have been posted.

Why would anyone dislike the outcome? Seems like you should get the SCOTUS to revise its ruling:

"The Supreme Court has said such evidence by itself provides probable cause for a search unless the
suspect can show the dog is unreliable-an opportunity that does not arise until long after the
search is carried out.