Thread: Bad outcome
View Single Post
  #100   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Hank Hank is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2014
Posts: 672
Default Bad outcome

On 1/19/2014 11:36 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:01:21 -0600, amdx wrote:

On 1/19/2014 6:05 PM,
wrote:
k

He said "incandescent" That is an incandescent bulb. Your trusty old
A19, non halogen.


But as I said, it's not a standard 100 Watt bulb.
It is a 130 Volt bulb, there's an exception for them
at least for now.
Mikek


The point BAO was trying to make was bans work. It sounds like this
"ban" is so full of exceptions that it is meaningless.
I only buy 130v bulbs anyway. My line voltage cruises around 124v and
regular 120v bulbs burn out pretty quickly.

Just for a real world example of meaningless bans. In 1994 they
"banned" large capacity magazines. The government was not willing to
buy back all of the existing ones (that pesky 5th amendment thing) so
there was a gray market for "pre-ban" magazines. (much like the pre
ban light bulbs)
There never seemed to be a lack of pre-ban magazines for sale for the
next decade until the law expired and they weren't even that
expensive. I believe they were coming in by the truck load.


I wonder why the populace can't be trusted to make good choices on their
owm. Perhaps it's because they rely on the government to do it for them.
I am about 90% converted to led. There are a few flourescent tubes left
in my house but no incand. to my knowlege.