"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/12/13, 5:29 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/12/13, 1:44 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/12/13, 11:44 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 12 December 2013 10:48:30 UTC-4, John H. wrote:

snip...

*Those* are the poor. How many of those are getting food stamps,
welfare checks, free health care,

cell phones, etc.?

snip...

John H. -- Hope you're NOT having a great day!


Y'all give free cellphones to the poor??
Very generous of you, Johnny Mop.


Like so many conservatives who really don't give a ****, Herring and a
few others here think "poor" people only live in countries other than the
United States. It's ok with them if little kids in the United States have
to live in crowded shelters. After all, they say, it's better than having
to live in a cardboard box. When the Pope calls out for a kinder, gentler
society, they think he is excluding the United States, or that they have
no need to pay attention because, after all, they aren't "papists."

We really need to find a cure for "religion."




How come those kids living in shelters and on welfare have parents that
dropped out of school, to lazy to get up in the morning and go compete with
an illegal that seems to be able to get a job, etc. maybe we ought to take
care of the kid, and cut the nuts off the dad, and tie the tubes of the
women after a couple kids while on welfare and unmarried. Would probably
do more for society than the War on Poverty that has been going since LBJ,
cost more than Viet Nam, Iraq and Afghanistan together, and we have lost
the WOP. What is your cure for poverty? And I see churches doing a lot
more for the poor, than any group of atheists!



Congrats, Bilious, on yet another wonderful right-wing rant, this time
one that ignores the plight of the kids so you can go after their
parents. How very conservatrasher of you. After all, the kids created
their problem by being born, right?





No, we created the problem by making it easy to have a lot of kids and not
care for them! And you reading comprehension still sucks. I pointed out
early on, we need to take care of the kids. But remove the problem parents
from becoming parents over and over.



By what means, Bilious? Involuntary sterilization, like the Germans did
to the Jews and the Gypsies in the late 1930s and 1940s? I don't think
that will go over big here.

Perhaps a better approach might be to destigmatize sexuality, and start
teaching about "the birds and the bees" in our public schools starting
in, say, the 4th grade and continuing through high school, and also, to
sexually active kids and adults, making condoms and other forms of birth
control readily available at little or no charge. It's significantly less
expensive to give a young couple a pack of condoms or a packet of pills
than it is to support yet another baby. And of course, the morning after
pill and abortion on demand will also help keep down the numbers of unsupported kids.




We start teaching sex in schools earlier now than we did in your on my
youth. How has that worked out? Condoms, Norplant, pills are all
available a,lot cheaper and easier than most of the items those 'poor'
acquire. Just one pair of those fancy sneakers would pay for a couple
years birth control even if they had to pay for it. But since those same
poor are on Medicaid, what is their excuse for getting pregnant? Where is
society holding those 'parents' responsible for the child? Maybe we honor
those deadbeats too much!
http://www.newschannel5.com/story/22...t-reality-show
He should have the option of getting snipped, or going to jail for stealing
from society. Society is having to put up the money for his pecker use, so
he is stealing from society. But, you who brags of having sexual relations
as a very young male, are probably jealous of those deadbeats.