On 11/30/13, 9:12 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/30/2013 7:47 AM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:08:39 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Friday, November 29, 2013 6:41:42 PM UTC-6,
No, I am not a theologian, but I did have as a college roommate for an

academic year a fellow who got his master's at Union Theological

Seminary, and was ordained an Episcopal priest. He got me to go to

Sunday Episcopal services on campus because, he claimed, they served
the

best Sunday student breakfast and had the best-looking coeds at their

services. He was right on both counts.

Of course there would be an alternate motive for going.


He and I argued some on issues religious. We're still close friends.



I have an M.A. in English, and my concentration was in etymology. As
for

your interpretations, you're just proving my point, that biblical

interpretation is in the mind of the beholder. There's nothing wrong or

intellectually dishonest about that, as long as one admits it.



I'm glad you told me. THANKS! But, you don't believe in the book
anyhow. so why make a big deal out of it? I mean, why are you trying
to interpret something something you don't believe in anyhow?


That's my question for atheists. Why fight so hard against something
that you firmly believe is
non-existent?

Why not fight against flying pigs?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!



It's hate.. and they need someone to blame for their failures...


Speaking of failures, here we have PsychoScotty, the ultimate failure.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.