On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:24:12 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 11/21/2013 9:44 AM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:24:20 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 11/21/13, 9:19 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

On 11/21/2013 8:20 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

On 11/21/13, 8:14 AM, True North wrote:
What the xxxx?

Hankie, that memo you cited is 8.5 years old.
Are you regressing backwards too?
Be careful you don't bump into Johnny in your race to the past.


Don...please put some context in your posts. I don't read FlaJim's potty
dumps, so I have no idea what you are referring to here.

Thanks.


Maybe you should. Even you would probably gotten a chuckle out of that
one.

I have a self-imposed limitation on the amount of right-wing stupid I
read each day. The few posts of FlaJim I see second or third hand remind
me of the sorts of lame insults you'd hear in junior high school, as do
the posts of Herring and a handful of others. Since I get my daily
quotient of "stupid" from reading some of PsychoSnotty's posts, I feel
no need to read more of them.

It's good to know the insults thrown about by you and Don are 'mature, adult' insults...such as the
'PsycohSnotty' usage in that post.

What a f***ing joke!

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!



At the risk of sounding "judgmental" to Scott, there's no question that
the bulk of the posts in this newsgroup sound like they originated in a
Jr. High School playground. It's screwy when one considers that most
of us are old farts over the age of 50. It seems to have become one of
those "you started it" debates that are never resolved. Oh well.


Actually, my post was a response to Harry. When he refers to others' use of 'lame insults you'd hear
in junior high school', I get a chuckle.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!