On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:57:12 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 11/16/2013 1:09 AM, wrote:


On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:41:06 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


So all those reports that stated bin Laden was ****ed because G.H.W.
Bush put troops in holy Saudi Arabia, and that G.H.W. was targeted by
bin Laden were just more obfuscation put out by Dubya and his
administration? Sure.



You can't bring up HW without implicating Clinton, since he did not
reverse any of those policies and actually started the "drive by
shootings" with stand off weapons that ****ed off so many people in
the islamic community.
He also kept the Iraq war going for 8 years. That wasn't free.



I thought that was an interesting comment by Harry (above). I wonder
if he realizes what the implications are.


Please explain, What about Harry's comment provoked this interest. He's made up more bull**** to
support his asinine attacks on Bush.

Stay tuned, it'll happen a dozen more times over the weekend.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!