BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Califbill

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 695555588406074347.336773bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 579345792406067882.642720bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 14377863406053108.919177bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:11:25 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:21:20 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

The permit is issued yearly based on an inspection of the stables, barn,
and grounds by the animal control inspector. She checks to ensure
sanitary and safe conditions for both the horse(s) and that may visit in
the barn area.

Is that any different than home inspections for the safe storage of
firearms?

===

Yes, big difference, unless your stable is also your dwelling.

Inspecting the interior of a home except at the time of construction
or renovation generally requires a search warrant and probable cause,
and that's the way it should stay unless you want to roll the clock
back to colonial times and British rule. It's another example of
northeastern nanny state mentality run amok.

Yeah, what he said.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

It's the GOP that doesn't want progress.....

Progress? Maybe all progress is not good. Illegal search was very
important to the Founders of this country.

So was witch hunting.

I don not know of any of the founders that were involved in witch hunting.
Maybe you can give a link.

Wait, are you trying to say that the founding fathers were personally
involved in everything that they subscribed to? Do you not think the
Pilgrims can be labeled as "founding fathers"? Have you never heard of
the Salem Witch trials?

The Pilgrims were not the founding fathers. And you realize the Pilgrims
at Plymouth, MA were two different groups that did not like each other?
And the Salem Witch Trials were more, a way too steal someone else's
property.

Who said they weren't "founding fathers"?

You are exercising your dumb a lot on this thread.