On 11/6/13, 6:24 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 11/6/2013 3:21 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:26:53 -0500, Hank©
wrote:
On 11/6/2013 9:45 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/6/13, 9:42 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article , says...
On 11/4/13, 12:59 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/4/2013 11:57 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
(Snip)
I think the law should accommodate the need to protect children
from all
sorts of abuse, including smutty text language from an adult.
--
But... But... But... Aren't you a librul?
I am indeed, and happy to be a "liberal," "progressive,"
"left-winger," and believe that children need to be protected from
abusive, predatory adults.
You feelin guilty of something?
Isn't that the same guy telling us that sex with adolescents was 'OK'?
John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!
The discussion was about ten year old girls, and yes, harry specifically
stated that ten year old girls should be able to choose to have sex, and
have abortions without parental permission or even notification...
Liar, liar, pants on fire. Never said that, no matter how many times you
repeat it.
Also, unlike you, I've never discussed blowjobs on usenet while a child
of mine was watching the screen.
--
Religion: together we can find the cure.