On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:39:48 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 10/27/2013 12:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/27/13, 11:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/26/2013 3:52 PM, True North wrote:
On Saturday, 26 October 2013 16:25:43 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/26/2013 3:06 PM, John H wrote:

On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:31:40 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:



Very good Harry.

With that additional info I could probably think oh him as a 'john'. ;-)



You can always count on Harry for some anti-social stuff. Great, isn't he?



John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!







He is obviously in a lot of pain... Seriously John, can you imagine

being his age and having his history?


Say what?
You're the one crying about having cancer and heart problems... and you're only in your mid-fifties.
You should hope you make it to Harry's age.. although there's slim chance of you wearing yourself out working. ~~ Snerk ~~


Did all those lies make you feel better don... Remember, everyone knows
you had your chance to say it to my face and get your head smashed in,
but you ran scared... sooooo, you really got nothing to say anymore....
really...

Saved!


PsychSnotty is safe in saying these things here because he knows no one
is going make an effort to punch out his lights, even if he were across
the street. I go to Connecticut twice a year, but the thought of wasting
an hour driving to South Windsor where he lives never crosses my mind,
and, of course, he wouldn't dare show up in Milford or Branford, where
we usually stay. He's nothing more than a sawed-off sickly coward.

I have an attorney, no problems! After the **** he spewed, I figured I'd
put an end to this ****. And it WILL end, very soon.


Any self respecting attorney would read the juvenile drivel in this
newsgroup and laugh you out of his office.

Actually, it is the very specific claims by Scotty about contacting my
minor child and the very specific slanderous claims he made about me and
my family.

I wonder how Scotty got your child's email address? Or, did your child contact him first? Or did
such contact ever really take place? And lastly,if it *did* take place, so what?

And, I think the slanderous claim about family record is this:

Scotty - 473 Kevin - 502


As you can see, you're ahead.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!