|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
|
|
Cramming Religion Down Throats
On 10/19/13, 12:26 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
On 10/19/13 6:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...
On 10/18/13, 8:24 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:54:03 PM UTC-5, F. O. A. D. wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:19:43 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 6:17 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:42:46 AM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
I didn't say religious polling places were "dangerous," you
did. But I
do believe they are completely inappropriate as polling places for
several reasons, including my feeling that voting at a church is a
violation of the Second Amendment.
The Second Amendment?
How can voting at a church or religios facility violate the
right of
and for a US citizen to lawfully bear arms?
First amendment...my mistake. Yeah, great idea...take your guns to
church, and if the preacher gets him wrong, why, just shoot him and
everyone else you can. Terrific.
Why would you encourage foul gun play?
Sarcasm,
Harry, that wasn't funny even as a joke.
We don't take gun violence seriously in this country, so what else is
there but sarcasm?
Who but the right would want everybody to own a dangerous firearm, but
be against healthcare for everybody?
They do not require you to own a firearm, so why require insurance?
Freedom of choice? I think if someone chooses to not have insurance,
and they are of the age of majority, you get minimal health care. Just
ease your way to the next state of the body. The other day, driving by
the entrance of Walmart, there is a young couple with the obligatory
begging sign. Girl is sitting down with Tattoos all over her body, and
lighting up a cigarette. Just lazy. Why should the rest of us take
care of these people. They will not get insurance anyway, and if they
did apply they would have 100% subsidy and no deductibles. Just like
they now get from the welfare system. Except the insurance corporations
would get more profit. Harry is for that, corporate profit. Most
likely yourself also.
You obviously have *no* idea of what I am for, in health care
"insurance." What I am for is a single-payer system that keeps health
care insurers out of the equation, ala Medicare, although it might be
possible to allow health care insurers to provide "supplemental"
coverages to those who want them. I also have no use for privately owned
"for profit" hospitals.
|