On 10/2/2013 12:28 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/2/13 12:12 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:50:56 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/2/13 11:48 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:53:25 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 05:36:21 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

I don't think you know squat about this. Server electrical costs
that
will be billed to the government, hosting costs and line rental fees
that will be billed to the government. Contractors who run those
websites furloughed.
Nobody around to monitor for hacks.
etc, etc.



The new, alternate website took money to create, electricity to
host, and has to be monitored for hacks. You didn't know that?

Your argument falls apart.

===

Yes, and you can bet that the original web site is up and running with
back door access available to USCG, US Customs and other law
enforcement agencies..

The weather pages are still up
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/mob/

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/?atlc



Well, I think it would be a terrific public service if you and W'hine
spend your time keeping track of all the federal government websites,
and let us know which are or are not working at a given moment.

Unlike the people up north, we watch storms and prepare BEFORE they
come kick our ass.

Yeah, right. Sure. I was in SE Florida the day after Andrew, taking
photos, doing interviews, and helping in the preparation of a report
about what sorts of buildings failed and why. Not much preparation was
evident.

That was 20 years ago. Out of curiosity, That report you were a helper
on; did it lead to any changes of any kind that helped improve building
codes and construction methods? Or was it just another meaningless fluff
piece that ended up un the round file.