"jps" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:30:09 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:47:34 -0700, jps wrote:

On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:20:46 -0700 (PDT), wrote:



Why in God's name would the NRA choose a venue that didn't allow
guns?

Why not?

Because in every case of mass murder, the NRA has supported the idea
that more guns would have made the situation safer.


"Gun Free Zones" are anathema to the NRA.

Bull****.

You must be daft. The NRA has been arguing against gun free zones and
citing them as the reason that shooters are attracted to them. This
argument was used in response to Sandyhook and elsewhere.

The reason is that leadership are a bunch of ****ing liars and
probably afraid of being killed by their own members.

More bull****.

Why would they book their event in an arena where guns were
prohibited? The leadership is very vocal about guns making our
citzenry safer.

What's bull**** is any of your arguments, because you don't field
anything that a brain would recognize as an argument.

Here, just for you. Food for thought.

http://www.ijreview.com/2013/09/8085...-shootings/12/


Deflection. Your best argument is to turn your head away and post
bull**** that supports your point of view.

You can't argue the points because there's no good argument.

I can't believe you were a teacher. You'd think that math required
critical thinking skills but your arguments contain none.

--------------------------

Sure enough. The standard liberal tactic of name calling begins.