On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:57:52 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:15:18 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 21:01:19 -0400, wrote:



On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 20:14:46 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:



It is typical that abused women don't press charges the first few times

they are abused. It usually takes a hell of a beating for this to

happen. Well-documented in "the literature."



Nobody ever alleged that Shellie was ever touched but don't let the

facts get in the way of a good rant.

He was in a scuffle with the father in law according to the 9-11 call.

It is yet to be seen how that started.



As I said, I really do not care. Lock them all up as far as I am

concerned. If this was anyone but Zimmerman nobody would care.

I bet the Orange County cops got 2 dozen calls that were virtually the

same deal today.

Weren't you here talking about a speeding ticket a week ago?



You seem to be the one who is obsessed



Actually, Harry is just coming to the defense of Shellie because she is a well-known liar. There

seems to be a boat load (boating related) of empathy there.



Can't imagine why.



John (Gun Nut) H.



You and the other fox lemmings have empathy for a known wife abuser.
That's as low as a person can go.

Mutual restraining orders by an ex-fiancé does not make someone a wife abuser.

Being a wife abuser does, though.

In fact, in light of ms Z's conviction on perjury and the recanting of the gun lie, it makes it even that much less of an issue. Maybe just bad taste in women.

Again, I find it truly appalling that you'd stick up for a known spouse
abuser because FOX tells you to.


Is that really what FOX is saying now? Perhaps you could show us. With a 'cite'?

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!