On Friday, August 23, 2013 12:42:44 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Friday, August 23, 2013 10:37:32 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







On Friday, August 23, 2013 9:38:06 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,







says...















http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/08/22...t-be-president




Wait, Clinton supposedly didn't CALL HER BACK, but she "lied to my
face"????


"All she cares about is her own self. She promised me face to face," Smith said, "that she would check on this and call me back, because I said I wanted to know what happened."



Again; "She promised me face to face that she would check on this and call me back..."


The call, as you pointed out, never came. There's the lie.
Glad I could help.


BUT, has Hillary told HER side of the story? Why would you and Jawbone
automatically ASSume this lady is truthful and honest, and Hillary lied
to her? One could also ASSume the lady is mourning her loss and not
quite clear headed, right?



I made no assumption either way. All I did is point out what you missed, which is where the claim of a lie came from. If what the lady states is true, Hillary did lie.


You are the one making the ASSumptions.



No, until now, you never said "IF" the lady is telling the truth, you
just ASSumed she was.

Wrong. You, as you typically do, either don't completely read something, or simply don't understand what you read.

You wrote: "Wait, Clinton supposedly didn't CALL HER BACK, but she "lied to my face"????"

You failed to make the connection that she claims Clinton told her "to her face" that she would call her. Instead you focused on "CALL" (your caps, implying not to her face) and "lied to my face".

Bye.