posted to rec.boats
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
|
|
Ain't we great?
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/5/13 6:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/5/13 5:59 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/5/13 2:44 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:26:53 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:
Easy.
Small towns where there may not even be a local pharmacy, and even it
there is, everyone knows everyone else's business.
Small towns are not where the problem lies.
Don't you righties even bother to look?
Rural teens at high risk for pregnancy, analysis finds
Michelle Healy, USA TODAY 12:01 a.m. EST February 21, 2013
First-of-its-kind analysis by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and
Unplanned Pregnancy shows that the teen birth rate in rural counties is
nearly one-third higher than the rest of the nation.
Nationally, the birth rate for U.S. teens has plunged to record low
levels, but a new analysis shows that a disproportionate share of teen
births are in rural communities.
In 2010, the birth rate for girls ages 15 to 19 in rural counties was 43
per 1,000, nearly one-third higher than the rate for metropolitan
counties (33 per 1,000), says a report released Thursday.
http://tinyurl.com/a84uowf
The problem is there are a lot more urban kids than rural kids. As well as
certain urban areas have an extremely high rate of teen births.
That is a problem, but the pregnancy rate is higher among rural girls.
They must be less moral, right? 
Actually, if you also select only low income urban areas, the rate would
most likely be exponentially higher than rural areas.
And rocks have weight because if they didn't, they'd be floating in the air, eh?
You are hand picking a region, so hand pick equivalent regions.
|