BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Califbill

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:02:11 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:11:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay
about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are
bull****, right?

He had one arrest and no charges.

Martin had none.

But Martin was committing a "forcible felony" (aggravated assault)
when he was shot. A bystander could have legally shot him, in the
back.

776.012 Use of force in defense of person.?A person is justified in
using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the
extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is
necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other?s
imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the
use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to
prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or
another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony

What was Martin arrested for again?

Even if he was arrested, the records would most likely be sealed as he was
a minor.