On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:40:24 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Which of these was he arrested for? I find it sickly hilarious that you
defend Zimmerman who WAS arrested and Martin who was NEVER arrested....

What was Zimmerman ever CHARGED with. That was your original
contention.

1. Resisting officer with violence. (this happened while he was
drinking, by the way)
2. Restraining order issued against him for domestic violence.


Now, what was Martin ever charged with again??

Neither ever resulted in a CHARGE.

Cops don't charge people, They simply arrest them. The DA or states
attorney decides whether there are grounds for an actual charge.

Nope, only for felonies in Florida, where Zimmerman lives.

Zimmerman was never charged with anything, even after he shot Martin,
until politicians up to and including the intruder in chief demanded
it. (for political reasons, not facts)
In retrospect the first opinion of the states attorney the night of
the shooting was the right one., There was no case there.
Our local DA was on TV here saying the same thing the day after the
verdict and he explained why.
Zimmerman, like it or not was within his rights to use deadly force to
stop a physical attack that did not seem to be stopping.

Now, what was Martin arrested for again? Oh, nothing.......

....'cause he attacked someone and got his ass shot.

John (Gun Nut) H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!