On 7/28/13 6:33 PM, Eisboch wrote:


What party would that be Harry?

I am not interested in playing your word games. You have established
your feelings about Vietnam and those who served willingly or not. Many
felt they were doing their duty based on a culture that encouraged
service to the country, including the military, and promoted it as being
an honorable thing to do. Some did reluctantly because they were
drafted. But they served. I resent the fact that you have stooped
so low as to accuse some here of being purposeful baby killers and
asking crude questions like "How many innocent Asians did you kill?"
That's lower than whale ****.

Yeah, I know, you've repeated the "I am against the military
establishment and not the ones who served" thing several times. But
you also haven't hesitated to accuse those you know here personally as
well. You have no idea of what their backgrounds are or what they did.

Sorry, but I didn't have any respect for those attitudes and accusations
then and I don't have any respect for them now.

Have you *ever* done anything in your life that would be considered an
"honorable" thing to do, or have you spent your life simply looking out
for what *you* can get out of the system or the interests of those who
paid you to promote their interests? Based on your history of posting
here, I think it's the latter.

Anyone here who served in the military was paid to promote the interests
of the military and the political establishment.

You are right in one respect: I have no idea what the military veterans
in this newsgroup did while they were in uniform. Based on their
typically dirtbag behavior here, though, I can't imagine Herring,
FlaJim, Bert, et cetera, being anything but dirtbags while they were in
uniform.

I have nothing other than my gut feeling for this, but I suspect the
many months I spent in Vietnam finding and marking the bodies U.S.
service personnel killed in the field was at least as dangerous and
honorable as anything our boys here in uniform did. And the pay sucked.