BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

BAR[_2_]

In article , says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/14/13 3:14 PM, Eisboch wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...

On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 11:41:21 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

Innocent man? OJ is "innocent" as well, then right?

===

"If the glove don't fit, then you must acquit!"

OJ had a brilliant lawyer and the prosecution totally bungled the
case. His luck ran out however and he's where he belongs.

In my opinion there is no comparison between the two cases other
than
the racial aspect.

--------------------------------------------

Also, DNA technology and the procedures for handling samples were
not
anywhere near as advanced as they are today.
If O.J.'s trial were to take place today, there's no question he'd
be
convicted.

You mean, even with the crooked, racist cop involved?

--------------------------------

Careful. One of Mrs.E.'s prized possessions is a photograph of her
standing with O.J. with his arm around her. We were in California
having breakfast at the hotel and O.J. walked in and stopped at our
table to chat for a minute after I recognized him and said "Hi".
Next thing you know Mrs.E. hands me a camera and asked him for a
picture to which he cheerfully obliged.

My wife lived in Buffalo when OJ was playing for the Bills. In fact, he lived in her
neighborhood. Everybody has brushes with greatness.

I have a picture of me standing with the CNO of South Vietnam during the height of the
Vietnam war.