BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

JustWaitAFrekinMinute

On 7/5/2013 10:21 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/5/2013 9:57 AM, Eisboch wrote:

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

She IS a "witness". What was she called to the stand as? Someone who
knows nothing about the case, and has no experience in any aspect of
the
case?

_____________________________

I'll try one more time .

Contrary to you're statement, she *was NOT* a witness to any crime.
She simply examined photographs and reviewed the medical report of a
PA who examined Zimmerman.

Why do you have such a hard time understanding this?

Probably because you have a hard time understanding that she is INDEED a
"witness" for the court. If not, why would she be on the stand???

-----------------------------------------

The problem I have is understanding your line of logic in some of these
discussions. This one started with you posing the question,

"What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?"

I merely pointed out that the ME did *not* witness a crime in this
case. She testified *as* a witness her opinions of Zimmerman's
injuries.

Think of this way: In your question "witness" is a verb. In my
response, "witness" is a noun.

"
Good luck with this. Many people before you have tried to repair Loogies
thinker, and failed. ;-)

Kevin is smarter than you think.. he always manages to keep someone
running in circles