View Single Post
  #29   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
JustWaitAFrekinMinute JustWaitAFrekinMinute is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,106
Default Sharpton prediction

On 7/5/2013 9:57 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...


She IS a "witness". What was she called to the stand as? Someone who
knows nothing about the case, and has no experience in any aspect of
the
case?


_____________________________

I'll try one more time .

Contrary to you're statement, she *was NOT* a witness to any crime.
She simply examined photographs and reviewed the medical report of a
PA who examined Zimmerman.

Why do you have such a hard time understanding this?


Probably because you have a hard time understanding that she is INDEED a
"witness" for the court. If not, why would she be on the stand???

-----------------------------------------

The problem I have is understanding your line of logic in some of these
discussions. This one started with you posing the question,

"What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?"

I merely pointed out that the ME did *not* witness a crime in this
case. She testified *as* a witness her opinions of Zimmerman's injuries.

Think of this way: In your question "witness" is a verb. In my
response, "witness" is a noun.


"


On a side note.. you guys were right! This is much more fun to watch
than to be involved in It's like watching the proverbial "send him
looking for the shiny item in the corner of the round room".