BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Eisboch[_9_]

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

------------------------------------

The ME didn't witness any crime with respect to her testimony.
All
she did was evaluate Zimmerman's head wounds from photographs
and
review the report of the examination by the Physician
Assistant.

She was giving testimony AS an "expert WITNESS".

-----------------------------------------------

Read what you posted above. You made the statement, "What
"qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?"

She didn't "witness" any crime. She testified as a witness for
the
prosecution on her evaluation of Zimmerman's injuries based on
photos
and a PA's examination. What became contested was her statement
that
the injuries were a result of only two actions .... a punch in the
nose and a single "smash" of the head on the concrete walkway.

Oh, boy. It's VERY clear that like the FOXites, you've made up your
mind
already.

--------------------------------

I have not. I wish you would pay attention to what you post and
what
is posted as a response.

As it pertains to the medical examiner you stated:

What "qualifications" are needed to have witnessed a crime?

I answered that she was *not* a witness to a crime in this case.
She
was simply providing testimony regarding head wounds.

How do you conclude that I've "made up my mind" based on that?
I've stated several times that I don't know.

She IS a "witness". What was she called to the stand as? Someone who
knows nothing about the case, and has no experience in any aspect of
the
case?

_____________________________

I'll try one more time .

Contrary to you're statement, she *was NOT* a witness to any crime.
She simply examined photographs and reviewed the medical report of a
PA who examined Zimmerman.

Why do you have such a hard time understanding this?