On 6/23/13 7:30 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 6/23/2013 5:51 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:30:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 6/23/13 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...
They all missed my point. The point is like gun control... if we let
them give citizenship, without *first* securing the border, the border
won't get secured. There will be financing delays, lawsuits, and just
"rules" made by administration officials that delay or sink the
security
end of the bill asap.... It's just the way things go in Washington,
the
Dems make promises "if" the repubs will just cave and of course
like in
84 and the fence in '06... All we will end up with in millions of new
dem voters....
Scotty O'reilly speaks!!
It really doesn't matter whether a fence is erected along the
U.S.-Mexico border, because such devices don't work. The Great Wall of
China didn't work, and the Berlin Wall didn't work...both were breached
many, many times. But calling for the building of such a wall gets the
righties what they want...a delay in a real immigration plan "until" the
wall is built. It's just more conservative cynicism.
Got to get serious about those who climb the fence.
John (Gun Nut) H.
Can't even take folks seriously who think a wall would do less than we
are doing more. It defies logic... sure, hire all the new govt workers
but give them "all" the tools to do the job... That's all I am saying. A
decent wall and a few drones would do a lot but they really don't want
to stop all those voters from coming in until they destroy the two party
system... Then like so many monopolies in the past, they will shut the
borders hard, both ways...
What you are suggesting is simply a modern day version of what East
Germany did to keep its people from "emigrating" to the West, except, of
course, your goal is to keep Mexicans out, not in.
The United States as East Germany. What a concept.