Thread
:
More info.. not looking good...
View Single Post
#
121
posted to rec.boats
Eisboch[_8_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,103
More info.. not looking good...
"BAR" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:27:36 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:
I really don't understand what all the fuss is about. In most
states
you must have a background check to obtain a permit. What's the
big
deal about verifying that the permit is valid for both seller and
buyer in a private transfer? Again, it only takes a few minutes.
It's *verifying* the permit, not doing a new background check
each
time.
The fuss is that exercising most of your civil rights doesn't
require
prior government
approval. Why should selling a firearm require government approval?
--------------------------------------------------------
The government doesn't give approval. The government would only
flag
and disapprove, based on a valid reason.
Nobody's rights are violated, including those of felons.
When my applicaiton to purchase a regulated firearm in Maryland is
processed it will come
back as disapproved or not disapproved.
---------------------
Semantics. The bottom line is that the purpose of a background check
is to make sure you are legally entitled to buy the firearm.
The real "approval" is by whatever agency in Maryland regulates
firearm permits and purchases.
Reply With Quote
Eisboch[_8_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Eisboch[_8_]